ROBINSON v. GUILFORD COUNTY SHERIFF'S OFFICE et al
| ALVIN D. ROBINSON |
| GUILFORD COUNTY SHERIFF'S OFFICE and DANNY H. ROGERS |
| 1:2023cv00087 |
| January 30, 2023 |
| US District Court for the Middle District of North Carolina |
| LORETTA C BIGGS |
| JOI ELIZABETH PEAKE |
| Civil Rights: Other |
| 42 U.S.C. ยง 2000 Job Discrimination (Religion) |
| Plaintiff |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on March 20, 2023. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing 4
ORDER signed by MAG/JUDGE JOI ELIZABETH PEAKE on 03/20/2023, that Plaintiff's Application for Leave to Proceed In Forma Pauperis and Affidavit/Declaration in Support [Doc. #1 ] is DENIED, but this case is STAYED for 120 days, to allow Plaintiff time to pay the filing fee. Plaintiff must pay $102.00 within 30 days, and then make monthly payments of $100.00 every month until the $402.00 filing fee is paid, or this action will be dismissed without further notice. (Bowers, Alexis)
|
| Motions Referred to MAG/JUDGE JOI ELIZABETH PEAKE RE: #1 APPLICATION to Proceed IFP. (Garland, Leah) |
| Case ASSIGNED to JUDGE LORETTA C. BIGGS and MAG/JUDGE JOI ELIZABETH PEAKE. (Garland, Leah) |
| Filing 3 CIVIL COVER SHEET. (Carter, Alexus) |
| Filing 2 COMPLAINT against All Defendants, filed by ALVIN D. ROBINSON. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit A) (Carter, Alexus) |
| Filing 1 APPLICATION to Proceed IFP by ALVIN D. ROBINSON. (Carter, Alexus) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the North Carolina Middle District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
