WRITZ v. DURHAM CO. DETENTION FACILITY et al
JASHUN WRITZ and JOSHUA WRITZ |
DURHAM CO. DETENTION FACILITY and DURHAM CO. DETENTION |
1:2023cv00098 |
February 1, 2023 |
US District Court for the Middle District of North Carolina |
L PATRICK AULD |
LORETTA C BIGGS |
Prisoner: Civil Rights |
42 U.S.C. ยง 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights |
None |
Docket Report
This docket was last retrieved on March 2, 2023. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
Document Text |
---|
Filing 5 JUDGMENT signed by JUDGE LORETTA C. BIGGS on 3/2/2023 adopting the Magistrate Judge's Recommendation #3 ; that this action be FILED and DISMISSED sua sponte without prejudice to Plaintiff filing new complaints on the proper 1983 forms, which corrects the defects in the original complaint. (Sheets, Jamie) |
CASE REFERRED RE: #3 RECOMMENDED RULING - MAGISTRATE JUDGE to JUDGE LORETTA C. BIGGS. (Blay, Debbie) |
Filing 4 Notice of Mailing Recommendation. Objections to R&R due by 2/21/2023. Objections to R&R for Pro Se due by 2/24/2023. (Carter, Alexus) |
![]() |
![]() |
Case Assigned to JUDGE LORETTA C. BIGGS and MAG/JUDGE L. PATRICK AULD. (Butler, Carol) |
CASE REFERRED for Screening (Butler, Carol) |
Filing 2 COMPLAINT against All Defendants, filed by JOSHUA WRITZ. (Attachments: #1 Envelope - Front and Back)(Butler, Carol) |
Filing 1 APPLICATION to Proceed IFP by JOSHUA WRITZ. (Butler, Carol) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the North Carolina Middle District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.