STEWART v. KIJAKAZI
Plaintiff: NAOMI STEWART
Defendant: KILOLO KIJAKAZI, SOCIAL SECURITY ADMINISTRATION and US ATTORNEY'S OFFICE - SOCIAL SECURITY NOTICING
Case Number: 1:2023cv00184
Filed: February 28, 2023
Court: US District Court for the Middle District of North Carolina
Presiding Judge: JOI ELIZABETH PEAKE
Nature of Suit: Social Security: DIWC/DIWW
Cause of Action: 42 U.S.C. ยง 427 Social Security Benefits
Jury Demanded By: None
Docket Report

This docket was last retrieved on April 20, 2023. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.

Date Filed Document Text
April 20, 2023 Opinion or Order Filing 3 ORDER GRANTING LEAVE TO PROCEED IN FORMA PAUPERIS signed by MAG/JUDGE JOI ELIZABETH PEAKE on 04/20/2023, that Plaintiff's Application to Proceed in District Court without Prepaying Fees or Costs is GRANTED, and Plaintiff is hereby permitted to proceed in this action in forma pauperis, pursuant to 28 U.S.C. 1915(a). The Clerk's Office is directed to issue a Notice of Service in accordance with Rule 3 of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure's Supplemental Rules for Social Security Actions under 42 U.S.C. 405(g). (Bowers, Alexis)
April 20, 2023 Text Notice of Service in the Social Security Case Pursuant to the Supplemental Rules for Social Security Actions under 42 U.S.C. 405(g), Rule 3. The Clerk has issued a Notice of Electronic Filing (NEF) using the Case Management and Electronic Case Filing (CM/ECF) system, notifying the appropriate Regional Social Security Administration Office of the General Counsel and the United States Attorney's Office of the case. No summonses shall issue. Answer due 60 days from filing on this notice. Answer/Certified Administrative Record due by 6/20/2023. (Bowers, Alexis)
March 3, 2023 Motions Referred: RE: #2 MOTION for Leave to Proceed In Forma Pauperis, to MAG/JUDGE JOI ELIZABETH PEAKE. (Bowers, Alexis)
March 3, 2023 Case ASSIGNED to UNASSIGNED and MAG/JUDGE JOI ELIZABETH PEAKE. (Bowers, Alexis)
February 28, 2023 Filing 2 MOTION for Leave to Proceed In Forma Pauperis by NAOMI STEWART. (ARROWOOD, DERRICK)
February 28, 2023 Filing 1 COMPLAINT against KILOLO KIJAKAZI, filed by NAOMI STEWART.(ARROWOOD, DERRICK)

Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the North Carolina Middle District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: STEWART v. KIJAKAZI
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: NAOMI STEWART
Represented By: DERRICK K. ARROWOOD
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: KILOLO KIJAKAZI
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: SOCIAL SECURITY ADMINISTRATION
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: US ATTORNEY'S OFFICE - SOCIAL SECURITY NOTICING
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?