WILLIAMS v. UBER TECHNOLOGIES, INC. et al
| MATTHEW DRAKE WILLIAMS |
| UBER TECHNOLOGIES, INC., PORTIER, LLC, PROGRESSIVE INSURANCE COMPANY and UNITED FINANCIAL CASUALTY COMPANY |
| 1:2023cv00415 |
| May 19, 2023 |
| US District Court for the Middle District of North Carolina |
| THOMAS D SCHROEDER |
| JOE L WEBSTER |
| Insurance |
| 12 U.S.C. § 635 Breach of Insurance Contract |
| Defendant |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on July 17, 2023. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
ORDER granting #15 Motion for Extension of Time to Answer Amended Complaint for PORTIER, LLC and UBER TECHNOLOGIES, INC. Answer due by 7/24/2023. Signed by John Brubaker, Clerk of Court, on 7/17/2023. (Brubaker, John)
|
| Filing 15 Consent MOTION for Extension of Time to File Answer re #12 Amended Complaint, by PORTIER, LLC, UBER TECHNOLOGIES, INC.. (Attachments: #1 Text of Proposed Order)(SEATON, EMILY) |
| Filing 14 NOTICE of Special Appearance by attorney LINDSAY A. JOYNER on behalf of Defendants PORTIER, LLC, UBER TECHNOLOGIES, INC. ( Filing fee $ 25 receipt number ANCMDC-3591459.) (JOYNER, LINDSAY) |
| Filing 13 ANSWER to Amended Complaint and Counterclaim by UNITED FINANCIAL CASUALTY COMPANY. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit Declaration Page, #2 Exhibit Policy language)(SMITH, ALLEN) |
| Filing 12 AMENDED COMPLAINT against defendant PORTIER, LLC, UBER TECHNOLOGIES, INC., UNITED FINANCIAL CASUALTY COMPANY, filed by MATTHEW DRAKE WILLIAMS. (State Court document originally filed in Davidson County Superior Court, case number: 23CVS690) (Garland, Leah) |
| Reset Deadlines: PORTIER, LLC answer due 7/14/2023; UBER TECHNOLOGIES, INC. answer due 7/14/2023. (See 6/14/2023 Text Order) (Garland, Leah) |
| TEXT ORDER granting #11 Consent Motion Regarding Filing of Amended Complaint. For good cause shown, the motion is granted, and the Clerk is directed to file and docket Plaintiff's Amended Complaint, attached as Exhibit A to the motion (Docket Entry 11-1). The Amended Complaint shall be treated as the operative complaint in this matter. The deadline for Defendants Uber Technologies, Inc. and Portier, LLC to answer or otherwise respond to the Amended Complaint shall be extended up to and including July 14, 2023. Issued by MAG/JUDGE JOE L. WEBSTER on 6/14/2023.(Lee, Pedra) |
| Filing 11 Consent MOTION File Amended State Court Complaint and Extend Time to Answer by PORTIER, LLC, UBER TECHNOLOGIES, INC.. Response to Motion due by 7/5/2023 (Attachments: #1 Exhibit A - Plaintiff's Amended State Court Complaint)(DEDMAN, JAMES) |
| Motion Referred to MAGISTRATE JUDGE JOE L. WEBSTER RE: #11 Consent MOTION File Amended State Court Complaint and Extend Time to Answer. (Engle, Anita) |
| Filing 10 MOTION for Extension of Time to File Answer by United Financial Casualty Company. (Attachments: #1 Text of Proposed Order)(SMITH, ALLEN) |
| Filing 9 NOTICE of Attorney Appearance by attorney ALLEN C. SMITH on behalf of Defendant United Financial Casualty Company (SMITH, ALLEN) |
|
ORDER granting #10 Motion for Extension of Time to Answer for United Financial Casualty Company. Answer due by 7/9/2023. Signed by John Brubaker, Clerk of Court, on 6/7/2023. (Brubaker, John)
|
| Filing 8 NOTICE of Attorney Appearance by attorney EMILY SEATON on behalf of Defendants PORTIER, LLC, UBER TECHNOLOGIES, INC. (SEATON, EMILY) |
| Filing 7 Consent MOTION for Extension of Time to File Answer re #3 Complaint, (Amended Motion) by PORTIER, LLC, UBER TECHNOLOGIES, INC.. (Attachments: #1 Text of Proposed Order)(DEDMAN, JAMES) |
|
ORDER granting #7 Motion for Extension of Time to Answer filed by PORTIER, LLC; UBER TECHNOLOGIES, INC. Answer due 6/15/2023. Signed by Gloria L. Powell on 5/23/2023 on behlaf of John S. Brubaker, Clerk of Court. (Powell, Gloria)
|
| Filing 6 Notice of Right to Consent. (Attachments: #1 Consent Form) (Bowers, Alexis) |
| CASE REFERRED to Mediation pursuant to Local Rule 83.9b of the Rules of Practice and Procedure of this Court. Please go to our website under Attorney Information for a list of mediators which must be served on all parties. (Bowers, Alexis) |
| Filing 5 MOTION for Extension of Time to File Answer re #3 Complaint, by PORTIER, LLC, UBER TECHNOLOGIES, INC.. (DEDMAN, JAMES) |
| Filing 4 Summons Issued as to PORTIER, LLC, UBER TECHNOLOGIES, INC.. (State Court document originally filed in Davidson County Superior Court, case number 23cvs690, issued on 4/03/2023, listed as exhibit as Exhibit A to the #1 Petition for Removal) (Bowers, Alexis) |
| Filing 3 COMPLAINT against PORTIER, LLC, PROGRESSIVE INSURANCE COMPANY, UBER TECHNOLOGIES, INC., filed by MATTHEW DRAKE WILLIAMS. (State Court document originally filed in Davidson County Superior Court, case number 23cvs690, listed as exhibit as Exhibit A to the #1 Petition for Removal) (Attachments: #1 Exhibit A) (Bowers, Alexis) |
| Filing 2 NOTICE of Attorney Appearance by attorney JAMES M. DEDMAN, IV on behalf of Defendants Portier, LLC, UBER TECHNOLOGIES, INC. (DEDMAN, JAMES) |
| Filing 1 PETITION FOR REMOVAL from Davidson County Superior Court, case number 23cv690 against Matthew Drake Williams ( Filing fee $ 402 receipt number ANCMDC-3566457.), filed by Portier, LLC, UBER TECHNOLOGIES, INC.. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit A - State Court Complaint, #2 Notice of Filing Notice of Removal, #3 Proposed Acknowledgment of State Court, #4 Certificate of Service)(DEDMAN, JAMES) Modified on 5/19/2023 to add State Court information. (Bowers, Alexis). |
| Case Assigned to CHIEF JUDGE THOMAS D. SCHROEDER and MAG/JUDGE JOE L. WEBSTER. (Powell, Gloria) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the North Carolina Middle District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
