ABRAHAM GERSHONOWICZ, D.D.S. AND JAMES NEME, D.D.S., P.C. v. MANISH MISTRY DDS, PLLC
Plaintiff: ABRAHAM GERSHONOWICZ, D.D.S. AND JAMES NEME, D.D.S., P.C. doing business as BRIGHT SIDE DENTAL
Defendant: MANISH MISTRY DDS, PLLC
Case Number: 1:2023cv00459
Filed: June 7, 2023
Court: US District Court for the Middle District of North Carolina
Presiding Judge: JOE L WEBSTER
Nature of Suit: Trademark
Cause of Action: 15 U.S.C. ยง 1114 Trademark Infringement
Jury Demanded By: Plaintiff
Docket Report

This docket was last retrieved on June 12, 2023. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.

Date Filed Document Text
June 12, 2023 Filing 5 Summons Issued as to MANISH MISTRY DDS, PLLC. (Garland, Leah)
June 12, 2023 CASE REFERRED to Standing Order 30. (Garland, Leah)
June 12, 2023 CASE REFERRED to Mediation pursuant to Local Rule 83.9b of the Rules of Practice and Procedure of this Court. Please go to our website under Attorney Information for a list of mediators which must be served on all parties. (Garland, Leah)
June 12, 2023 Case ASSIGNED to UNASSIGNED and MAG/JUDGE JOE L. WEBSTER. (Garland, Leah)
June 7, 2023 Filing 4 NOTICE of Attorney Appearance by attorney ERICA ROGERS on behalf of Plaintiff Abraham Gershonowicz, D.D.S. and James Neme, D.D.S., P.C. dba Bright Side Dental (ROGERS, ERICA)
June 7, 2023 Filing 3 Corporate Disclosure Statement. (SCHOUTEN, JOSEPH)
June 7, 2023 Filing 2 NOTICE of Attorney Appearance by attorney JOSEPH A. SCHOUTEN on behalf of Plaintiff Abraham Gershonowicz, D.D.S. and James Neme, D.D.S., P.C. dba Bright Side Dental (SCHOUTEN, JOSEPH)
June 7, 2023 Filing 1 COMPLAINT, Jury Trial Demanded against Manish Mistry DDS, PLLC ( Filing fee $ 402 receipt number ANCMDC-3579987.), filed by Abraham Gershonowicz, D.D.S. and James Neme, D.D.S., P.C. dba Bright Side Dental. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit 1-Registration Certificate for Plaintiff's Mark, #2 Exhibit 2-Registration Certificate for Plaintiff's Design Mark, #3 Exhibit 3-Samples of Plaintiff's Use of its Mark, #4 Exhibit 4-Samples of Defendant's Use of the Infringing Mark, #5 Exhibit 5-Plaintiff's First Cease and Desist Letter, #6 Exhibit 6-Defendant's Response Letter, #7 Exhibit 7-Plaintiff's Second Cease and Desist Letter, #8 Proposed Summons, #9 Civil Cover Sheet)(SCHOUTEN, JOSEPH) Modified on 6/7/2023 to complete caption. (Bowers, Alexis)

Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the North Carolina Middle District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: ABRAHAM GERSHONOWICZ, D.D.S. AND JAMES NEME, D.D.S., P.C. v. MANISH MISTRY DDS, PLLC
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: ABRAHAM GERSHONOWICZ, D.D.S. AND JAMES NEME, D.D.S., P.C. doing business as BRIGHT SIDE DENTAL
Represented By: ERICA ROGERS
Represented By: JOSEPH A. SCHOUTEN
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: MANISH MISTRY DDS, PLLC
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?