GEOSURFACES SOUTHEAST, INC. et al v. SMITH et al
GEOSURFACES SOUTHEAST, INC. and POLYLOOM CORPORATION OF AMERICA doing business as TENCATE GRASS |
KENNETH D. SMITH and BEYNON SPORTS SURFACES, INC. |
1:2023cv00545 |
June 30, 2023 |
US District Court for the Middle District of North Carolina |
THOMAS D SCHROEDER |
JOE L WEBSTER |
Defend Trade Secrets Act (of 2016) |
None |
Docket Report
This docket was last retrieved on June 30, 2023. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
Document Text |
---|
Filing 4 Notice of Right to Consent. Counsel shall serve the attached form on all parties. (Attachments: #1 Consent Form) (Hicks, Samantha) |
Filing 3 Summons Issued as to All Defendants. (Attachments: #1 Summons - Beynon) (Hicks, Samantha) |
Filing 2 NOTICE by GeoSurfaces SouthEast, Inc., Polyloom Corporation of America d/b/a TenCate Grass re #1 Complaint, of Filing Summons in a Civil Action (LUNSFORD, MIGNON) |
Filing 1 COMPLAINT FOR INJUNCTIVE RELIEF AND DAMAGES against Beynon Sports Surfaces, Inc., Kenneth D. Smith ( Filing fee $ 402 receipt number ANCMDC-3598679.), filed by GeoSurfaces SouthEast, Inc., Polyloom Corporation of America d/b/a TenCate Grass. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit A-Sales Employment Agreement, #2 Civil Cover Sheet)(LUNSFORD, MIGNON) Modified on 6/30/2023 to complete title. (Hicks, Samantha) |
Case ASSIGNED to CHIEF JUDGE THOMAS D. SCHROEDER and MAG/JUDGE JOE L. WEBSTER. (Hicks, Samantha) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the North Carolina Middle District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.