MICHELICH et al v. HARTFORD ACCIDENT & INDEMNITY COMPANY
| PAUL MICHELICH and LAURI MICHELICH |
| HARTFORD ACCIDENT & INDEMNITY COMPANY |
| 1:2023cv00564 |
| July 7, 2023 |
| US District Court for the Middle District of North Carolina |
| JOI ELIZABETH PEAKE |
| Insurance |
| 28 U.S.C. ยง 1332 Diversity |
| Plaintiff |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on August 29, 2023. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
| Case Reported Settled Stipulation of Dismissal due by 9/28/2023. See #11 Notice (Garrett, Kim) |
| Filing 11 NOTICE of Settlement Agreement in Principle by HARTFORD ACCIDENT & INDEMNITY COMPANY (BRYAN, JAMES) |
| TEXT ORDER issued by MAG/JUDGE JOI ELIZABETH PEAKE on 8/7/23 granting #10 Motion for Extension of Time to Answer filed by HARTFORD ACCIDENT & INDEMNITY COMPANY to 8/28/2023. Answer due by 8/28/2023. (Garrett, Kim) |
| Motions Referred: RE: #10 Consent MOTION for Extension of Time to File Answer , to MAG/JUDGE JOI ELIZABETH PEAKE (Garrett, Kim) |
| Filing 10 Consent MOTION for Extension of Time to File Answer by HARTFORD ACCIDENT & INDEMNITY COMPANY. (Attachments: #1 Text of Proposed Order Proposed Order Granting Motion for Extension of Time)(FAJEN, OLIVIA) |
| Filing 9 NOTICE of Attorney Appearance by attorney OLIVIA F. FAJEN on behalf of Defendant HARTFORD ACCIDENT & INDEMNITY COMPANY (FAJEN, OLIVIA) |
| Filing 8 Notice to Parties RE: SO30. (Attachments: #1 Consent Form) Response due 8/25/2023 (Williamson, Wanda) |
ORDER granting #7 Motion for Extension of Time to Answer for HARTFORD ACCIDENT & INDEMNITY COMPANY. Answer due by 8/7/2023. Signed by John Brubaker, Clerk of Court, on 7/12/2023. (Brubaker, John)
|
| Filing 7 Consent MOTION for Extension of Time to File Answer by HARTFORD ACCIDENT & INDEMNITY COMPANY. (Attachments: #1 Text of Proposed Order) (BRYAN, JAMES) |
| CASE REFERRED to Mediation pursuant to Local Rule 83.9b of the Rules of Practice and Procedure of this Court. Please go to our website under Attorney Information for a list of mediators which must be served on all parties. (Bowers, Alexis) |
| CASE REFERRED to Standing Order 30. (Bowers, Alexis) |
| Case ASSIGNED to UNASSIGNED and MAG/JUDGE JOI ELIZABETH PEAKE. (Bowers, Alexis) |
| Filing 6 ECF 30 Day Notice as to Attorney GEOFFREY GILBERT. ECF 30 Day Notice due by 8/9/2023. (Bowers, Alexis) |
| Filing 5 Summons Issued as to HARTFORD ACCIDENT & INDEMNITY COMPANY. (State Court document originally filed in Moore County Superior Court, case number 23cvs717, issued 05/22/2023, listed as Exhibit A to the #1 Petition for Removal) (Bowers, Alexis) |
| Filing 4 COMPLAINT against HARTFORD ACCIDENT & INDEMNITY COMPANY, filed by PAUL MICHELICH, LAURI MICHELICH. (State Court document originally filed in Moore County Superior Court, case number 23cvs717, listed as Exhibit A to the #1 Petition for Removal)(Bowers, Alexis) |
| Filing 3 Corporate Disclosure Statement. (BRYAN, JAMES) |
| Filing 2 NOTICE of Attorney Appearance by attorney JAMES WEST BRYAN on behalf of Select Role Type HARTFORD ACCIDENT & INDEMNITY COMPANY (BRYAN, JAMES) |
| Filing 1 PETITION FOR REMOVAL from Moore County Superior Court, case number 23cvs717 against Lauri Michelich, Paul Michelich ( Filing fee $ 402 receipt number ANCMDC-3602683.), filed by HARTFORD ACCIDENT & INDEMNITY COMPANY. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit A to Notice of Removal)(BRYAN, JAMES) Modified on 7/10/2023 to add State Court information (Bowers, Alexis). |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the North Carolina Middle District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
