MANESS v. KIJAKAZI
| WILLIAM MANESS |
| KILOLO KIJAKAZI |
| 1:2023cv00619 |
| July 26, 2023 |
| US District Court for the Middle District of North Carolina |
| THOMAS D SCHROEDER |
| JOE L WEBSTER |
| Social Security: DIWC/DIWW |
| 42 U.S.C. ยง 405 Review of HHS Decision (DIWC) |
| None |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on September 22, 2023. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
| Motion Submitted: #7 Consent MOTION to Remand to JUDGE THOMAS D. SCHROEDER. (Marsh, Keah) |
| Case Reassigned to JUDGE THOMAS D. SCHROEDER. UNASSIGNED no longer assigned to the case. (Marsh, Keah) |
| Filing 8 MEMORANDUM filed by Defendant KILOLO KIJAKAZI re #7 Consent MOTION to Remand filed by KILOLO KIJAKAZI. (LEACH, DAVID) |
| Filing 7 Consent MOTION to Remand by KILOLO KIJAKAZI. Response to Motion due by 10/11/2023 (Attachments: #1 Text of Proposed Order order, #2 Text of Proposed Order judgment)(LEACH, DAVID) |
Filing 6
ORDER REQUIRING RESPONSE REGARDING REFERENCE TO A MAGISTRATE JUDGE. IT IS THEREFORE ORDERED that Notice is given that many districts around the country have had great success in encouraging consent to magistrate judges in social security appeal cases. Maximizing dispositions on consent rather than through reports and recommendations maintains the just, speedy, and inexpensive determination of these cases, as well as realizing the benefits of bringing about a quicker resolution of the appeal than the report and recommendation process. Consistent with the direction of the Administrative Office of the United States Courts, this Court reminds the government and members of the social security bar of the consent option, and its time savings for litigants. IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that counsel for the Parties consult with their clients concerning the foregoing and complete and return the attached MDNC Form 85 within 30 days informing the Clerk's Office as to whether or not they consent to disposition by a U.S. Magistrate Judge. Entered at the direction of the Chief Judge. (Attachments: #1 Consent form)(Taylor, Abby)
|
| Filing 5 NOTICE to Parties in Social Security Case: Plaintiff's Dispositive Brief - SSA due by 10/6/2023. Defendant's Dispositive Brief - SSA due by 11/6/2023. Plaintiff's Reply Brief - SSA due by 11/20/2023. (Taylor, Abby) |
| Filing 4 SEALED Answer/Certified Administrative Record - Social Security Case filed by Defendant KILOLO KIJAKAZI, Plaintiff WILLIAM MANESS. The record is available in paper format at the Clerk's Office (Attachments: #1 Part 2, #2 Part 3, #3 Part 4, #4 Part 5, #5 Part 6, #6 Part 7, #7 Part 8, #8 Part 9, #9 Part 10, #10 Part 11, #11 Part 12, #12 Part 13, #13 Part 14, #14 Part 15, #15 Part 16, #16 Part 17, #17 Part 18, #18 Part 19, #19 Part 20, #20 Part 21, #21 Part 22, #22 Part 23)(REED, MARGARET) |
|
Filing 3
ORDER GRANTING LEAVE TO PROCEED IN FORMA PAUPERIS signed by MAG/JUDGE JOE L. WEBSTER on 07/31/2023, that the plaintiff in the above-entitled proceeding be, and is hereby, permitted to commence said proceeding in this Court without prepayment of fees or costs, or giving security therefor. [28 U.S.C. 1915(a)]. The Court will apply the Supplemental Rules for Social Security Actions under 42 U.S.C. 405(g). The Clerk's Office is directed to issue a Notice of Service pursuant to the Supplemental Rules for Social Security Actions under 42 U.S.C. 405(g) effective December 1, 2022. (Bowers, Alexis)
|
| Text Notice of Service in the Social Security Case Pursuant to the Supplemental Rules for Social Security Actions under 42 U.S.C. 405(g), Rule 3. The Clerk has issued a Notice of Electronic Filing (NEF) using the Case Management and Electronic Case Filing (CM/ECF) system, notifying the appropriate Regional Social Security Administration Office of the General Counsel and the United States Attorney's Office of the case. No summonses shall issue. Answer due 60 days from filing on this notice. Answer/Certified Administrative Record due by 9/29/2023. (Bowers, Alexis) |
| Case ASSIGNED to UNASSIGNED and MAG/JUDGE JOE L. WEBSTER. (Bowers, Alexis) |
| Motion Referred: RE: #2 APPLICATION to Proceed IFP, to MAG/JUDGE JOE L. WEBSTER. (Bowers, Alexis) |
| Filing 2 APPLICATION to Proceed IFP () by WILLIAM MANESS. (PIEMONTE, GEORGE) |
| Filing 1 COMPLAINT Requesting Review of An Administrative Decision Under The Social Security Act against KILOLO KIJAKAZI, filed by WILLIAM MANESS.(PIEMONTE, GEORGE) Modified on 7/27/2023 to complete caption (Bowers, Alexis). |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the North Carolina Middle District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
| Search for this case: MANESS v. KIJAKAZI | |
|---|---|
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Plaintiff: WILLIAM MANESS | |
| Represented By: | GEORGE C. PIEMONTE |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Defendant: KILOLO KIJAKAZI | |
| Represented By: | SSA NOTICING |
| Represented By: | DAVID LEACH |
| Represented By: | MARGARET REED |
| Represented By: | US ATTORNEY'S OFFICE-SOCIAL SECURITY NOTICING |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
