SEDLACEK v. KERNERSVILLE CHRYSLER DODGE, LLC
Plaintiff: Jeffrey Sedlacek
Defendant: Kernersville Chrysler Dodge, LLC
Case Number: 1:2023cv00641
Filed: August 2, 2023
Court: US District Court for the Middle District of North Carolina
Nature of Suit: Civil Rights: Jobs
Cause of Action: 28 U.S.C. ยง 451 Employment Discrimination
Jury Demanded By: Plaintiff
Docket Report

This docket was last retrieved on August 2, 2023. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.

Date Filed Document Text
August 2, 2023 Filing 1 COMPLAINT against All Defendants ( Filing fee $ 402 receipt number ANCMDC-3622614.), filed by Jeffrey Sedlacek. (Attachments: #1 Civil Cover Sheet Cover Sheet, #2 Exhibit Proposed Summons)(HERRMANN, SEAN)

Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the North Carolina Middle District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: SEDLACEK v. KERNERSVILLE CHRYSLER DODGE, LLC
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: Jeffrey Sedlacek
Represented By: SEAN F. HERRMANN
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Kernersville Chrysler Dodge, LLC
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?