HARRIS v. ISHEE et al
| DAVID ANTHONY HARRIS |
| TODD E. ISHEE and ROY COOPER |
| 1:2023cv00803 |
| September 18, 2023 |
| US District Court for the Middle District of North Carolina |
| WILLIAM L OSTEEN |
| JOI ELIZABETH PEAKE |
| Habeas Corpus (General) |
| 28 U.S.C. ยง 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State) |
| None |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on December 12, 2023. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
| Filing 4 Notice of Mailing Recommendation. Objections to R&R due by 11/13/2023. Objections to R&R for Pro Se due by 11/16/2023. (Bowers, Alexis) |
| Filing 3 RECOMMENDATION OF UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE signed by MAG/JUDGE JOI ELIZABETH PEAKE on 10/30/2023, that this action and the entire record of this proceeding be transferred to the United States District Court for the Eastern District of North Carolina for further screening and/or further proceedings. (Bowers, Alexis) |
| CASE REFERRED for Screening (Butler, Carol) |
| Case Assigned to JUDGE WILLIAM L. OSTEEN, JR and MAG/JUDGE JOI ELIZABETH PEAKE. (Butler, Carol) |
| Filing 2 AFFIDAVIT re #1 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus filed by Petitioner DAVID ANTHONY HARRIS. (Butler, Carol) |
| Filing 1 PETITION for Writ of Habeas Corpus, filed by DAVID ANTHONY HARRIS. (Attachments: #1 Cover Letter, #2 Envelope - Front and Back)(Butler, Carol) |
| Filing fee: $5.00, receipt number 2684. (Butler, Carol) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the North Carolina Middle District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
