WILLIAMS v. FIRST ADVANTAGE BACKGROUND SERVICES CORP.
MICHAEL NATHANIEL WILLIAMS |
FIRST ADVANTAGE BACKGROUND SERVICES CORP. |
1:2023cv00808 |
September 22, 2023 |
US District Court for the Middle District of North Carolina |
WILLIAM L OSTEEN |
JOI ELIZABETH PEAKE |
Consumer Credit |
15 U.S.C. ยง 1681 Fair Credit Reporting Act |
Both |
Docket Report
This docket was last retrieved on November 15, 2023. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
Document Text |
---|
Filing 10 NOTICE of Initial Pretrial Conference Hearing: Initial Pretrial Conference Hearing set for 12/15/2023 09:30 AM in Winston-Salem Courtroom #3 before MAG/JUDGE JOI ELIZABETH PEAKE. (kg) |
Filing 9 ANSWER to #1 Complaint, with Jury Demand by FIRST ADVANTAGE BACKGROUND SERVICES CORP.. (SPAK, JASON) |
ORDER granting #8 Motion for Extension of Time to Answer for FIRST ADVANTAGE BACKGROUND SERVICES CORP. Answer due by 11/14/2023. Signed by John Brubaker, Clerk of Court, on 10/25/2023. (Brubaker, John) |
Filing 8 Consent MOTION for Extension of Time to File Answer re #1 Complaint, by FIRST ADVANTAGE BACKGROUND SERVICES CORP.. (Attachments: #1 Text of Proposed Order)(SPAK, JASON) |
Filing 7 NOTICE of Attorney Appearance by attorney FRANK WALTER LEAK, JR on behalf of Defendant FIRST ADVANTAGE BACKGROUND SERVICES CORP. (LEAK, FRANK) |
Filing 6 Corporate Disclosure Statement identifying Corporate Parent FIRST ADVANTAGE CORPORATION for FIRST ADVANTAGE BACKGROUND SERVICES CORP. (SPAK, JASON) |
Filing 5 NOTICE of Special Appearance by attorney JASON A. SPAK on behalf of Defendant FIRST ADVANTAGE BACKGROUND SERVICES CORP. ( Filing fee $ 25 receipt number ANCMDC-3676089.) (SPAK, JASON) |
Filing 4 SUMMONS Returned Executed by MICHAEL NATHANIEL WILLIAMS as to FIRST ADVANTAGE BACKGROUND SERVICES CORP., served on 10/3/2023, answer due 10/24/2023. (MCCRAW, DAWN) |
Filing 3 Notice of Right to Consent. Counsel shall serve the attached form on all parties. (Attachments: #1 Consent Form)(Bowers, Alexis) |
Filing 2 Summons Issued as to FIRST ADVANTAGE BACKGROUND SERVICES CORP. (Bowers, Alexis) |
Case ASSIGNED to JUDGE WILLIAM L. OSTEEN, JR and MAG/JUDGE JOI ELIZABETH PEAKE. (Bowers, Alexis) |
Filing 1 COMPLAINT, Jury Trial Demanded against FIRST ADVANTAGE BACKGROUND SERVICES CORP. ( Filing fee $ 402 receipt number ANCMDC-3657972.), filed by MICHAEL NATHANIEL WILLIAMS. (Attachments: #1 Civil Cover Sheet)(MCCRAW, DAWN) Modified on 9/22/2023 to complete caption. (Bowers, Alexis) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the North Carolina Middle District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Search for this case: WILLIAMS v. FIRST ADVANTAGE BACKGROUND SERVICES CORP. | |
---|---|
Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
Search Web | [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Plaintiff: MICHAEL NATHANIEL WILLIAMS | |
Represented By: | DAWN M. MCCRAW |
Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Defendant: FIRST ADVANTAGE BACKGROUND SERVICES CORP. | |
Represented By: | JASON A. SPAK |
Represented By: | FRANK WALTER LEAK, JR. |
Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.