FARAHANI v. BLINKEN et al
PARISA FARAHANI |
ANTONY BLINKEN and CHIP LAITINEN |
1:2023cv00922 |
October 26, 2023 |
US District Court for the Middle District of North Carolina |
THOMAS D SCHROEDER |
JOE L WEBSTER |
Other Immigration Actions |
08 U.S.C. ยง 1329 Writ of Mandamus to Adjudicate Visa Petition |
None |
Docket Report
This docket was last retrieved on November 30, 2023. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
Document Text |
---|
Filing 5 NOTICE of Attorney Appearance by attorney BRANDON D. ZELLER on behalf of Defendants ANTONY BLINKEN, CHIP LAITINEN (ZELLER, BRANDON) |
Filing 4 SUMMONS Returned Executed by PARISA FARAHANI as to All Defendants. Answer due 01/19/2024. (GRAFTON, REBEKAH) Modified on 11/28/2023 to include answer deadline. (sh) |
Filing 3 Notice of Right to Consent. Counsel shall serve the attached form on all parties. (Attachments: #1 Consent to jurisdiction) (Lee, Ashley) |
Filing 2 Summons Issued as to All Defendants, U.S. Attorney and U.S. Attorney General (Lee, Ashley) |
Case ASSIGNED to JUDGE THOMAS D. SCHROEDER and MAG/JUDGE JOE L. WEBSTER. (Lee, Ashley) |
Filing 1 COMPLAINT FOR INJUNCTIVE RELIEF AND WRIT OF MANDAMUS against All Defendants ( Filing fee $ 402 receipt number ANCMDC-3683431.), filed by PARISA FARAHANI. (Attachments: #1 Civil Cover Sheet, #2 Summons)(GRAFTON, REBEKAH) (Attachment 2 replaced on 10/30/2023) (Lee, Ashley). Modified on 10/30/2023 to flatten the PDF summons (Lee, Ashley). |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the North Carolina Middle District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.