HOLCIM (US) INC. v. PYRTLE et al
HOLCIM (US) INC. |
GREGORY K. PYRTLE, PYRTLE VENTURES LLC and CARSON INDUSTRIES, INC. |
1:2023cv01019 |
November 21, 2023 |
US District Court for the Middle District of North Carolina |
L PATRICK AULD |
LORETTA C BIGGS |
Fraud or Truth-In-Lending |
28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Fraud |
Plaintiff |
Docket Report
This docket was last retrieved on January 10, 2024. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
Document Text |
---|
Filing 15 Corporate Disclosure Statement. (HILSTON, HENRY) |
Filing 14 Corporate Disclosure Statement. (FERGUSON, THOMAS) |
Filing 13 MOTION for Extension of Time to File Answer re #1 Complaint, by GREGORY K. PYRTLE, PYRTLE VENTURES LLC. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit Exhibit A, #2 Text of Proposed Order)(ARCHER, CHAD) |
Filing 12 NOTICE of Attorney Appearance by attorney HENRY O. HILSTON on behalf of Defendants GREGORY K. PYRTLE, PYRTLE VENTURES LLC (HILSTON, HENRY) |
Filing 11 NOTICE of Attorney Appearance by attorney CHAD A. ARCHER on behalf of Defendants GREGORY K. PYRTLE, PYRTLE VENTURES LLC (ARCHER, CHAD) |
Filing 10 Consent MOTION for Extension of Time to File Answer re #1 Complaint, (or otherwise respond) by CARSON INDUSTRIES, INC.. (Attachments: #1 Text of Proposed Order)(FERGUSON, THOMAS) |
ORDER granting #10 Motion for Extension of Time to Answer for CARSON INDUSTRIES, INC. Answer due by 2/2/2024. Signed by John Brubaker, Clerk of Court, on 12/28/2023. (jsb) |
ORDER granting #13 Motion for Extension of Time to Answer for GREGORY K. PYRTLE and PYRTLE VENTURES LLC. Answer due by 2/2/2024. Signed by John Brubaker, Clerk of Court, on 12/28/2023. (jsb) |
Filing 9 AFFIDAVIT OF SERVICE as to CARSON INDUSTRIES, INC. served on 12/13/2023, answer due 1/3/2024. (NANNEY, JOSEPH) |
Filing 8 AFFIDAVIT OF SERVICE as to PYRTLE VENTURES LLC served on 12/12/2023, answer due 1/2/2024. (NANNEY, JOSEPH) |
Filing 7 AFFIDAVIT OF SERVICE as to GREGORY K. PYRTLE served on 12/12/2023, answer due 1/2/2024. (NANNEY, JOSEPH) |
Filing 6 Corporate Disclosure Statement identifying Corporate Parent Holcim Participations (US) Inc., Other Affiliate Holcim Ltd. for HOLCIM (US) INC... (YERBY, JOHN) |
Filing 5 Notice of Right to Consent. Counsel shall serve the attached form on all parties. (Attachments: #1 Consent to jurisdiction) (al) |
Filing 4 Summons Issued as to All Defendants. (Attachments: #1 summons issued to Gregory pyrtle, #2 summons issued Pyrtle ventures) (al) |
Filing 3 NOTICE of Special Appearance by attorney BENJAMIN B TYMANN on behalf of Plaintiff HOLCIM (US) INC. ( Filing fee $ 25 receipt number ANCMDC-3707701.) (TYMANN, BENJAMIN) |
Filing 2 NOTICE of Special Appearance by attorney JOHN PATRICK YERBY on behalf of Plaintiff HOLCIM (US) INC. ( Filing fee $ 25 receipt number ANCMDC-3707681.) (YERBY, JOHN) |
CASE REFERRED to Mediation pursuant to Local Rule 83.9b of the Rules of Practice and Procedure of this Court. Please go to our website under Attorney Information for a list of mediators which must be served on all parties. (al) |
Case ASSIGNED to JUDGE LORETTA C. BIGGS and MAG/JUDGE L. PATRICK AULD. (al) |
Filing 1 COMPLAINT AND JURY DEMAND against All Defendants (Filing fee $ 402 receipt number ANCMDC-3704165), filed by HOLCIM (US) INC. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit A Maintenance Agreement, #2 Exhibit B Maintenance Agreement, #3 Exhibit C Price Sheet, #4 Exhibit D Invoices, #5 Exhibit E Skyjack Invoice)(NANNEY, JOSEPH) Modified on 11/21/2023 to remove duplicate text and remove unnecessary punctuation. (lg) Modified to add wording to title on 11/21/2023 (al). |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the North Carolina Middle District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.