HILL v. BUFFALO
| SIMARON D. HILL |
| EDDIE BUFFALO |
| 1:2024cv00025 |
| January 5, 2024 |
| US District Court for the Middle District of North Carolina |
| WILLIAM L OSTEEN |
| JOE L WEBSTER |
| Habeas Corpus (General) |
| 28 U.S.C. ยง 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State) |
| None |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on April 16, 2024. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
| Filing 4 USCA ORDER: Movant has filed a motion under 28 U.S.C. 2244 for an order authorizing the district court to consider a second or successive application for relief under 28 U.S.C. 2254. The court denies the motion. (USCA Case number: 24-112) (lg) |
| 2244 case docketed Case manager Kirsten Hancock. USCA 24-112. (sh) |
| Filing 3 Notice of Mailing Recommendation. Objections to R&R due by 1/31/2024. Objections to R&R for Pro Se due by 2/5/2024. (sh) |
| Filing 2 RECOMMENDATION AND ORDER OF UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE signed by MAG/JUDGE JOE L. WEBSTER on 1/17/2024; RECOMMENDED that the Petition be dismissed for failure to apply to the United States Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit for an order authorizing this district court to consider the current Petition as is required by 28 U.S.C. 2244 and that, there being no substantial issue for appeal concerning the denial of a constitutional right affecting the conviction nor a debatable procedural ruling, a certificate of appealability not issue. ORDERED that in forma pauperis status is granted for the sole purpose of entering this Recommendation and Order. FURTHER ORDERED that the Clerk shall send Petitioner a copy of this Recommendation and Order, instruction forms for filing 2254 petitions in this Court and for filing a Motion for Authorization in the United States Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit, an application to proceed in forma pauperis (upon request), and four copies of 2254 petition forms (more copies will be sent on request). Petitioner should keep the original and two copies of the 2254 petition which can be submitted in this Court if Petitioner obtains approval from the Fourth Circuit. (sh) |
ORDER signed by MAG/JUDGE JOE L. WEBSTER on 1/17/2024; that in forma pauperis status is granted for the sole purpose of entering #2 Recommendation and Order. (sh)
|
| CASE REFERRED for Screening (cb) |
| Case Assigned to JUDGE WILLIAM L. OSTEEN, JR and MAG/JUDGE JOE L. WEBSTER. (cb) |
| Filing 1 PETITION for Writ of Habeas Corpus, filed by SIMARON D. HILL. (Attachments: #1 Cover Letter, #2 Envelope - Front and Back)(cb) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the North Carolina Middle District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
| Search for this case: HILL v. BUFFALO | |
|---|---|
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Petitioner: SIMARON D. HILL | |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Respondent: EDDIE BUFFALO | |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
