CHAMBERS v. GUILFORD COUNTY SHERIFF
DWIGHT CHAMBERS |
GUILFORD COUNTY SHERIFF |
1:2024cv00051 |
January 22, 2024 |
US District Court for the Middle District of North Carolina |
LORETTA C BIGGS |
JOI ELIZABETH PEAKE |
Habeas Corpus (General) |
28 U.S.C. ยง 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (Federal) |
None |
Docket Report
This docket was last retrieved on March 15, 2024. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
Document Text |
---|
Filing 6 Envelope Containing #4 JUDGMENT addressed to DWIGHT CHAMBERS GUILFORD COUNTY JAIL HIGH POINT FACILITY ID #5084 P.O. BOX 18247 GREENSBORO, NC 27419 returned to court by postal service, marked undeliverable because RETURN TO SENDER - REFUSED. (sh) |
Filing 5 Envelope Containing #3 Notice of Mailing Recommendation, #2 RECOMMENDED RULING - MAGISTRATE JUDGE, 2241 forms, instructions, and a current application to proceed in forma pauperis addressed to DWIGHT CHAMBERS GUILFORD COUNTY JAIL HIGH POINT FACILITY ID #5084 P.O. BOX 18247 GREENSBORO, NC 27419 returned to court by postal service, marked undeliverable because LEGAL DOCUMENTS MUST BE SENT DIRECTLY TO THE INMATE AT THEIR FACILITY. THEY CANNOT BE PROCESSED AT THIS PO BOX. (sh) |
Filing 4 JUDGMENT signed by JUDGE LORETTA C. BIGGS on 2/28/2024 adopting the Magistrate Judge's Recommendation; that this action be FILED and DISMISSED sua sponte without prejudice to Petitioner filing a new petition or action which corrects the defects of the current Petition. (sh) |
CASE REFERRED RE: #2 RECOMMENDED RULING - MAGISTRATE JUDGE, to JUDGE LORETTA C. BIGGS (db) |
Filing 3 Notice of Mailing Recommendation. Objections to R&R due by 2/16/2024. Objections to R&R for Pro Se due by 2/20/2024. (sh) |
Filing 2 ORDER AND RECOMMENDATION OF UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE signed by MAG/JUDGE JOI ELIZABETH PEAKE on 2/2/2024; ORDERED that in forma pauperis status is granted for the sole purpose of entering this Order and Recommendation. The Clerk is instructed to send Petitioner 2241 forms, instructions, and a current application to proceed in forma pauperis. RECOMMENDED that this action be filed, but then dismissed sua sponte without prejudice to Petitioner filing a new petition or action which corrects the defects of the current Petition. (sh) |
ORDER signed by JUDGE LORETTA C. BIGGS on 2/2/2024; that in forma pauperis status is granted for the sole purpose of entering #2 Order and Recommendation. (sh) |
CASE REFERRED for Screening (cb) |
Case Assigned to JUDGE LORETTA C. BIGGS and MAG/JUDGE JOI ELIZABETH PEAKE. (cb) |
Filing 1 PETITION for Writ of Habeas Corpus (Pursuant to 28: U.S.C. 2241), filed by DWIGHT CHAMBERS. (Attachments: #1 Envelope - Front and Back) (cb) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the North Carolina Middle District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Search for this case: CHAMBERS v. GUILFORD COUNTY SHERIFF | |
---|---|
Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
Search Web | [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Petitioner: DWIGHT CHAMBERS | |
Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Respondent: GUILFORD COUNTY SHERIFF | |
Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.