NEAL et al v. BROWER et al
| WILBERT A NEAL and SHENIKA DAVIS |
| DARREN BROWER and KNOWN AND UNKNOWN SHAREHOLDERS |
| 1:2024cv00078 |
| January 31, 2024 |
| US District Court for the Middle District of North Carolina |
| THOMAS D SCHROEDER |
| JOE L WEBSTER |
| Assault Libel & Slander |
| 28 U.S.C. ยง 1332 Diversity |
| Plaintiff |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on March 14, 2024. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
| Filing 11 Defendant Carrier411 Services, Inc.'s BRIEF re #8 MOTION to Dismiss Complaint Against Carrier411 Services, Inc. by Defendants DARREN BROWER, KNOWN AND UNKNOWN SHAREHOLDERS filed by DARREN BROWER, KNOWN AND UNKNOWN SHAREHOLDERS. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit 1 - Declaration of Darren Brewer ISO MTD, #2 Exhibit A - Terms of Service, #3 Exhibit 2 - Beckley v Priority Auto Group Inc., #4 Exhibit 3 - Ascend Health Corp v Wells, #5 Exhibit 4 - 1103 Norwalk Street LLC)(BOND, JOHN) |
| Filing 10 Defendant Darren Brewer's BRIEF re #7 MOTION to Dismiss Complaint Against Darren Brewer by Defendant DARREN BROWER filed by DARREN BROWER. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit 1 - Declaration of Darren Brewer in Support of Motion to Dismiss Complaint Against Darren Brewer, #2 Exhibit 2 - Beckley v Priority Auto Group Inc, #3 Exhibit 3 - 1103 Norwalk Street LLC)(BOND, JOHN) |
| Filing 9 Roseboro Letter as to Plaintiffs SHENIKA DAVIS, WILBERT A NEAL. (at) (Main Document 9 replaced on 3/14/2024 to correct date. ) (at). |
| Filing 8 MOTION to Dismiss Complaint Against Carrier411 Services, Inc. by DARREN BROWER, KNOWN AND UNKNOWN SHAREHOLDERS. Response to Motion due by 4/3/2024 (Attachments: #1 Defendant Carrier411 Services, Inc.'s Brief in Support of Motion to Dismiss Complaint, #2 Exhibit 1 - Declaration of Darren Brewer in Support of Motion to Dismiss against Carrier411 Services, Inc., #3 Exhibit A - Carrier411 Terms of Service, #4 Exhibit 2 - Beckley v. Priority Auto Group, #5 Exhibit 3 - Ascend Health Corp., #6 Exhibit 4 - 1103 Norwalk Street, L.L.C.)(BOND, JOHN) |
| Filing 7 MOTION to Dismiss Complaint Against Darren Brewer by DARREN BROWER. Response to Motion due by 4/3/2024 (Attachments: #1 Defendant Darren Brewer's Brief in Support of Motion to Dismiss Complaint, #2 Exhibit 1 - Declaration of Darren Brewer in Support of Motion to Dismiss Complaint, #3 Exhibit 2- Beckley v. Priority Auto Group, #4 Exhibit 3 - 1103 Norwalk Street, L.L.C.)(BOND, JOHN) |
| Filing 6 NOTICE of Attorney Appearance by attorney JOHN DEWEY BOND, III on behalf of Defendants DARREN BROWER, KNOWN AND UNKNOWN SHAREHOLDERS (BOND, JOHN) |
| Filing 5 Notice of Right to Consent. Counsel shall serve the attached form on all parties. (Attachments: #1 Consent to jurisdiction)(al) |
| Filing 4 Summons Issued as to All Defendants. (al) |
| Filing 3 Notice of Signed Pro Se Electronic Service Consent by WILBERT A NEAL anthonyneal502@gmail.com (al) |
| Filing 2 CIVIL COVER SHEET. (al) |
| Filing 1 COMPLAINT against All Defendants, filed by WILBERT A NEAL. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit A, #2 Exhibit C, #3 Exhibit D, #4 Exhibit E, #5 Exhibit F, #8 Exhibit G, #9 Exhibit H, #10 Exhibit I, #11 Exhibit J) (al) |
| Case ASSIGNED to JUDGE THOMAS D. SCHROEDER and MAG/JUDGE JOE L. WEBSTER. (al) |
| CASE REFERRED to Mediation pursuant to Local Rule 83.9b of the Rules of Practice and Procedure of this Court. Please go to our website under Attorney Information for a list of mediators which must be served on all parties. (al) |
| Receipt of Funds in the amount of $ 405.00.(Receipt number 3673) (al) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the North Carolina Middle District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
