ARMSTRONG v. NORTH CAROLINA et al
ARTHUR O. ARMSTRONG |
NORTH CAROLINA and KOURY CORPORATION |
1:2024cv00096 |
February 6, 2024 |
US District Court for the Middle District of North Carolina |
L PATRICK AULD |
WILLIAM L OSTEEN |
Civil Rights: Other |
42 U.S.C. ยง 1983 Civil Rights Act |
Plaintiff |
Docket Report
This docket was last retrieved on February 21, 2024. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
Document Text |
---|
Filing 6 JUDGMENT signed by JUDGE WILLIAM L. OSTEEN, JR on 02/21/2024 that this action is DISMISSED, without any authorization to file a notice of appeal. FURTHER ORDERED AND ADJUDGED that Plaintiff shall pay $400 as a monetary sanction for this continuation of his longstanding pattern of frivolous litigation conduct. FURTHER ORDER AND ADJUDGED that Plaintiff Arthur O. Armstrong is hereby ENJOINED from making any filings in this Court unless and until he first pays any outstanding monetary sanction(s). (al) |
Filing 5 ORDER signed by JUDGE WILLIAM L. OSTEEN, JR on 02/21/2024, adopting Text Recommendations docketed (2/06/2026), that this action is DISMISSED, without any authorization to file a notice of appeal, and that plaintiff shall pay $400 as a monetary sanction for this continuation of his long-standing pattern of frivolous litigation conduct, for the reasons cited in the Magistrate Judge's Recommendation. FURTHER ORDERED that in addition to any and all other injunctions in place against Plaintiff Arthur O. Armstrong, Plaintiff is hereby ENJOINED from making any filings in this Court unless and until he first pays any outstanding monetary sanction(s). FURTHER ORDERED that any documents submitted to the court by Plaintiff prior to such payment shall be held for his retrieval or otherwise returned to him without docketing. A Judgment dismissing this action will be filed contemporaneously with this Order. (al) Modified on 2/22/2024 to correct docket text (al). |
CASE REFERRED to JUDGE WILLIAM L. OSTEEN, JR. (jd) |
Filing 4 OBJECTION TO RECOMMENDED RULING - MAGISTRATE JUDGE filed by Plaintiff ARTHUR O. ARMSTRONG. (al) |
Filing 3 Notice of Mailing Recommendation: Objections to R&R due by 2/21/2024. Objections to R&R for Pro Se due by 2/26/2024. (lg) |
Filing 2 CIVIL COVER SHEET. (lg) |
Filing 1 COMPLAINT against KOURY CORPORATION, NORTH CAROLINA, filed by ARTHUR O. ARMSTRONG. (lg) |
TEXT RECOMMENDATION that the Court (A) dismiss this action, without any authorization to file a notice of appeal, as a frivolous continuation of Plaintiff's long-standing pattern of frivolous litigation conduct, particularly as addressed (in regard to the same basic claims against the same Defendants) in the Court's recent disposition of Armstrong v. North Carolina, No. 1:23CV380; (B) order Plaintiff to pay $400 as a monetary sanction for this continuation of his long-standing pattern of frivolous litigation conduct (because smaller sanction amounts previously imposed have proven ineffective in deterring Plaintiff's frivolous filings); and (C) in addition to any and all other injunctions in place against Plaintiff, enjoin him from making any filings in this Court unless and until he first pays any outstanding monetary sanction(s), with a further directive that any documents submitted to the Court by Plaintiff prior to such payment be held for his retrieval or otherwise returned to him without docketing. Issued by MAG/JUDGE L. PATRICK AULD on 02/06/2024. (AULD, L.) |
Receipt of Funds in the amount of $ 405.00. Receipt number: 3746. (lg) |
Case ASSIGNED to JUDGE WILLIAM L. OSTEEN, JR and MAG/JUDGE L. PATRICK AULD. (lg) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the North Carolina Middle District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.