THOMPSON v. CITY OF DURHAM et al
| BRANDON E. THOMPSON |
| CITY OF DURHAM, DURHAM COUNTY POLICE DEPARTMENT, ANGELA ASHBY, OFFICER BROWN, J.R. SALMON, INVESTIGATOR WHEELER, INVESTIGATOR SOUCIE, OFFICER HALL, INVESTIGATOR BOND, INVESTIGATOR BURWELL and INVESTIGATOR MEDINA |
| 1:2024cv00139 |
| February 23, 2024 |
| US District Court for the Middle District of North Carolina |
| WILLIAM L OSTEEN |
| JOE L WEBSTER |
| Habeas Corpus (Prison Condition) |
| 42 U.S.C. ยง 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights |
| Plaintiff |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on April 16, 2024. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
| Filing 8 JUDGMENT that this action is DISMISSED WITHOUT PREJUDICE to Plaintiff filing a new complaint, on the proper 1983 forms, which is accompanied by the applicable $405.00 filing fee. Signed by JUDGE WILLIAM L. OSTEEN, JR on 04/16/2024. (at) |
Filing 7
ORDER that the Magistrate Judge's Recommendation, (Doc. #5 ), is ADOPTED. FURTHER ORDERED that this action is DISMISSED WITHOUT PREJUDICE to Plaintiff filing a new complaint, on the proper 1983 forms, which is accompanied by the applicable $405.00 filing fee. A Judgment dismissing this action will be entered contemporaneously with this Order. Signed by JUDGE WILLIAM L. OSTEEN, JR on 04/16/2024. (at)
|
| Filing 6 Notice of Mailing Recommendation: Objections to R&R due by 3/20/2024. Objections to R&R for Pro Se due by 3/25/2024. (lg) |
|
Filing 5
ORDER AND RECOMMENDATION OF UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE signed by MAG/JUDGE JOE L. WEBSTER on 03/06/2024, that in forma pauperis status is granted for the sole purpose of entering this Order and Recommendation. The Clerk is instructed to send Plaintiff 1983 forms, instructions, an application to proceed in forma pauperis, and a copy of pertinent parts of Fed. R. Civ. P. 8 (i.e., Sections (a) & (d)). IT IS RECOMMENDED that this action be filed and dismissed sua sponte without prejudice to Plaintiff filing a new complaint, on the proper 1983 forms, which is accompanied by the applicable $405.00 filing fee. (lg)
|
|
ORDER signed by MAG/JUDGE JOE L. WEBSTER on 03/06/2024, that in forma pauperis status is granted for the sole purpose of entering this Order and Recommendation. (lg)
|
| CASE REFERRED for Screening (cb) |
| Case Assigned to JUDGE WILLIAM L. OSTEEN, JR and MAG/JUDGE JOE L. WEBSTER. (cb) |
| Filing 4 Case transferred in from District of North Carolina Eastern; Case Number 5:24-ct-03041. Original file certified copy of transfer order and docket sheet received. |
|
Filing 3
ORDER - The court ORDERS the clerk to TRANSFER this action to the United States District Court for the Middle District of North Carolina where venue is proper. Signed by District Judge James C. Dever III on 2/22/2024. Copy sent to plaintiff via US Mail. (Indig, A.) [Transferred from North Carolina Eastern on 2/23/2024.]
|
| Filing 2 MOTION to Proceed Without Prepayment of Fees filed by Brandon E. Thompson. (Indig, A.) [Transferred from North Carolina Eastern on 2/23/2024.] |
| Filing 1 COMPLAINT against Angela Ashby, Investigator Bond, Officer Brown, Investigator Burwell, City of Durham, Durham County Police Department, Officer Hall, Investigator Medina, J.R. Salmon, Investigator Soucie and Investigator Wheeler filed by Brandon E. Thompson. (Attachment: #1 Envelope) (Indig, A.) [Transferred from North Carolina Eastern on 2/23/2024.] |
| Case Submitted to District Judge James C. Dever III for initial review. (Indig, A.) [Transferred from North Carolina Eastern on 2/23/2024.] |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the North Carolina Middle District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
