KAVUL v. JADDOU
| Serge Kavul and SERGE MUJING KAVUL |
| Director of U.S. Citizenship and Immigration Services and UR JADDOU |
| 1:2024cv00156 |
| February 28, 2024 |
| US District Court for the Middle District of North Carolina |
| CATHERINE C EAGLES |
| JOI ELIZABETH PEAKE |
| Other Immigration Actions |
| 05 U.S.C. ยง 551 Administrative Procedure Act |
| None |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on March 27, 2024. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
| Filing 5 STANDARD ORDER for civil cases proceeding before CHIEF DISTRICT JUDGE CATHERINE C. EAGLES. (rw) |
| Filing 4 SUMMONS Returned Executed by SERGE MUJING KAVUL. UR JADDOU served on 3/8/2024, answer due 5/7/2024. as to (Attachments: #1 Exhibit A: Certified Mail Receipt)(FULGHUM, THOMAS) |
| Filing 3 Notice of Right to Consent. Counsel shall serve the attached form on all parties. (Attachments: #1 Consent Form) (sh) |
| Filing 2 Summons Issued as to UR JADDOU, U.S. Attorney and U.S. Attorney General. (Attachments: #1 US Attorney Summons, #2 US Attorney General Summons) (sh) |
| Case ASSIGNED to CHIEF DISTRICT JUDGE CATHERINE C. EAGLES and MAG/JUDGE JOI ELIZABETH PEAKE. (lg) |
| Filing 1 COMPLAINT against UR JADDOU ( Filing fee $ 405 receipt number ANCMDC-3774277.), filed by Serge Kavul. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit Proposed Summons, #2 Exhibit Proposed Summons, #3 Exhibit Proposed Summons, #4 Civil Cover Sheet)(FULGHUM, THOMAS) Modified on 2/29/2024 to remove duplicate text. (cc) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the North Carolina Middle District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
