JANSON v. CSX TRANSPORTATION, INC.
| Gabriel Michael Janson |
| CSX TRANSPORTATION, INC. |
| 1:2024cv00163 |
| February 29, 2024 |
| U.S. District Court for the Middle District of North Carolina |
| L PATRICK AULD |
| THOMAS D SCHROEDER |
| P.I.: Other |
| 28 U.S.C. ยง 1332 Diversity |
| Both |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on April 4, 2024. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing 9
ORDER with the consent of the parties, that pursuant to 28 U.S.C. 1447(c) the case is REMANDED to the Superior Court of Randolph County. Signed by JUDGE THOMAS D. SCHROEDER on 4/4/24(cb)
|
| Motion Submitted to JUDGE THOMAS D. SCHROEDER: #8 MOTION to Remand. (ae) |
| Filing 8 MOTION to Remand by GABRIEL MICHAEL JANSON. Response to Motion due by 4/18/2024 (GARDNER, BRADLEY) |
| Filing 7 NOTICE of Initial Pretrial Conference Hearing: Initial Pretrial Conference Hearing set for 4/29/2024 09:30 AM in Greensboro Courtroom #1A before MAG/JUDGE L. PATRICK AULD. (kg) |
| Filing 6 Corporate Disclosure Statement identifying Corporate Parent CSX CORPORATION for CSX TRANSPORTATION, INC. (SPRADLIN, ANDREW) |
| Filing 5 CSXT's ANSWER to #2 Complaint with Jury Demand by CSX TRANSPORTATION, INC. (SPRADLIN, ANDREW) |
| Filing 4 NOTICE of Attorney Appearance by attorney ANDREW B. SPRADLIN on behalf of Defendant CSX TRANSPORTATION, INC. (SPRADLIN, ANDREW) |
| Filing 3 Additional Attachments to Main Document re #2 Complaint . (SPRADLIN, ANDREW) |
| Filing 2 COMPLAINT against CSX TRANSPORTATION, INC., filed by GABRIEL MICHAEL JANSON. (State Court document originally filed in Randolph County Superior Court, Case number 24CVS021, listed as Attachment 2 to #1 Petition for Removal) (lg) |
| Case ASSIGNED to JUDGE THOMAS D. SCHROEDER and MAG/JUDGE L. PATRICK AULD. (lg) |
| CASE REFERRED to Mediation pursuant to Local Rule 83.9b of the Rules of Practice and Procedure of this Court. Please go to our website under Attorney Information for a list of mediators which must be served on all parties. (sh) |
| Filing 1 PETITION FOR REMOVAL from Randolph County Superior, case number 24CVS021 against Gabriel Michael Janson (Filing fee $ 405 receipt number BNCMDC-3774808), filed by CSX TRANSPORTATION, INC. (Attachments: #1 Civil Cover Sheet, #2 Exhibit, #3 Exhibit)(SPRADLIN, ANDREW) Modified on 3/1/2024 to add State Court information. (lg) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the U.S. Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the North Carolina Middle District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
| Search for this case: JANSON v. CSX TRANSPORTATION, INC. | |
|---|---|
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Plaintiff: Gabriel Michael Janson | |
| Represented By: | BRADLEY JAMES GARDNER, I |
| Represented By: | SPENCER L. HILL |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Defendant: CSX TRANSPORTATION, INC. | |
| Represented By: | ANDREW B. SPRADLIN |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
