MCCLARY v. STEWARD et al
RONALD MCCLARY |
FNU STEWARD, FNU HARGROVE, SERGEANT RANSOM and LT. JERNIGAN |
1:2024cv00167 |
February 28, 2024 |
US District Court for the Middle District of North Carolina |
CATHERINE C EAGLES |
JOE L WEBSTER |
Habeas Corpus (Prison Condition) |
42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights |
None |
Docket Report
This docket was last retrieved on April 15, 2024. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
Document Text |
---|
|
Filing 7 APPLICATION to Proceed IFP by RONALD MCCLARY. (at) |
Filing 6 AMENDED COMPLAINT against All Defendants, filed by RONALD MCCLARY.(at) |
Filing 5 MOTION to Amend #1 Complaint by RONALD MCCLARY. Response to Motion due by 4/29/2024. (at) |
Filing 4 OBJECTION TO RECOMMENDED RULING - MAGISTRATE JUDGE re #2 Recommended Ruling - Magistrate Judge,, by Plaintiff RONALD MCCLARY. Response to Objections to R&R due by 4/22/2024. (Attachments: #1 Envelope - Front and Back) (at) |
CASE REFERRED RE: #2 RECOMMENDED RULING - MAGISTRATE JUDGE to CHIEF DISTRICT JUDGE CATHERINE C. EAGLES (rw) |
Filing 3 Notice of Mailing Recommendation. Objections to R&R due by 3/25/2024. Objections to R&R for Pro Se due by 3/28/2024. (at) |
|
|
CASE REFERRED for Screening (cb) |
Case Assigned to CHIEF DISTRICT JUDGE CATHERINE C. EAGLES and MAG/JUDGE JOE L. WEBSTER. (cb) |
Filing 1 COMPLAINT against All Defendants, filed by RONALD MCCLARY. (Attachments: #1 Envelope - Front and Back)(cb) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the North Carolina Middle District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.