FREEMAN v. KIM et al
| DWAYNE E. FREEMAN |
| SGT. KIM, SGT. LAURA and LUETENANT KNIGHT |
| 1:2024cv00204 |
| March 5, 2024 |
| US District Court for the Middle District of North Carolina |
| LORETTA C BIGGS |
| JOI ELIZABETH PEAKE |
| Civil Rights: Other |
| 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act |
| None |
Docket Report
This docket was last retrieved on April 11, 2024. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
| Filing 3 Notice of Mailing Recommendation Objections to R&R due by 4/25/2024 Objections to R&R for Pro Se due by 4/30/2024. (cc) |
| Filing 2 RECOMMENDATION OF UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE signed by MAG/JUDGE JOI ELIZABETH PEAKE on 04/10/2024, IT IS THEREFORE RECOMMENDED that this matter be dismissed for failure to pay the filing fee or submit an application to proceed in forma pauperis, and pursuant to 28 U.S.C. 1915(e)(2)(B) for failure to state a claim upon which relief may be granted based on the analysis set out in Case No. 1:23CV294, without prejudice to Plaintiff re-filing his claims on the proper forms and with the filing fee or an application to proceed in forma pauperis, if Plaintiff believes he can state a proper claim against a proper defendant under 1983. (cc) |
| Case ASSIGNED to JUDGE LORETTA C. BIGGS and MAG/JUDGE JOI ELIZABETH PEAKE. (lg) |
| Filing 1 COMPLAINT against KIM, KNIGHT, LAURA, filed by DWAYNE E. FREEMAN. (Attachments: #1 Envelope - Front and Back) (lg) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the North Carolina Middle District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.