BSI SOLUTIONS, INC. v. TWIN CITY FIRE INSURANCE COMPANY et al
| BSI SOLUTIONS, INC. |
| TWIN CITY FIRE INSURANCE COMPANY and NUTMEG INSURANCE AGENCY, INC. |
| 1:2024cv00280 |
| March 28, 2024 |
| US District Court for the Middle District of North Carolina |
| L PATRICK AULD |
| LORETTA C BIGGS |
| Insurance |
| 28 U.S.C. ยง 1330 Breach of Contract |
| Plaintiff |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on March 28, 2024. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
| Filing 3 Notice of Right to Consent. Counsel shall serve the attached form on all parties. (Attachments: #1 Consent to Jurisdiction). (cc) |
| Filing 2 Summons Issued as to All Defendants. (Attachments: #1 Summons issued for Nutmeg Insurance Agency, INC.). (cc) |
| Filing 1 COMPLAINT against All Defendants ( Filing fee $ 405 receipt number ANCMDC-3798778.), filed by BSI SOLUTIONS, INC.. (Attachments: #1 Civil Cover Sheet, #2 Proposed Summons for Defendant Twin City Fire Insurance Company, #3 Proposed Summons for Defendant Nutmeg Insurance Agency, Inc.)(MALONE, J.) |
| CASE REFERRED to Mediation pursuant to Local Rule 83.9b of the Rules of Practice and Procedure of this Court. Please go to our website under Attorney Information for a list of mediators which must be served on all parties. (cc) |
| Case ASSIGNED to JUDGE LORETTA C. BIGGS and MAG/JUDGE L. PATRICK AULD. (cc) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the North Carolina Middle District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
