CONCRETE ACCESSORIES OF GA, INC. v. CLARK, JR.
CONCRETE ACCESSORIES OF GA, INC. |
JAMES CLARK, JR. |
1:2024cv00295 |
April 2, 2024 |
US District Court for the Middle District of North Carolina |
Contract: Other |
28 U.S.C. ยง 1346 cc Contract Claims |
None |
Docket Report
This docket was last retrieved on April 2, 2024. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
Document Text |
---|
Filing 6 MEMORANDUM filed by Plaintiff CONCRETE ACCESSORIES OF GA, INC. re #5 MOTION for Temporary Restraining Order In Support Of filed by CONCRETE ACCESSORIES OF GA, INC.. (KLASS, DAVID) |
Filing 5 MOTION for Temporary Restraining Order by CONCRETE ACCESSORIES OF GA, INC.. Response to Motion due by 4/23/2024 (Attachments: #1 Text of Proposed Order)(KLASS, DAVID) |
Filing 4 SEALED UNREDACTED DOCUMENTS filed by Defendant JAMES CLARK, JR., Plaintiff CONCRETE ACCESSORIES OF GA, INC. re #1 Complaint,,,. (Attachments: #1 Sealed Unredacted Ex. E to Verified Complaint- FW_ Dual utility anchors Email (Highlighted), #2 Sealed Unredacted Ex. F to Verified Complaint- study Email (Highlighted), #3 Sealed Unredacted Ex. H- to Verified Complaint CSI group review Email (Highlighted))(KLASS, DAVID) |
Filing 3 DECLARATION filed by Plaintiff CONCRETE ACCESSORIES OF GA, INC. re #2 MOTION to Seal [If the party filing this motion is not the party claiming confidentiality, the party claiming confidentiality must file a response within 14 days that includes the materials required by L.R. 5.4(c)(3).] filed by CONCRETE ACCESSORIES OF GA, INC.. (KLASS, DAVID) |
Filing 2 MOTION to Seal [If the party filing this motion is not the party claiming confidentiality, the party claiming confidentiality must file a response within 14 days that includes the materials required by L.R. 5.4(c)(3).] by CONCRETE ACCESSORIES OF GA, INC.. Response to Motion due by 4/16/2024 (KLASS, DAVID) |
Filing 1 COMPLAINT Verified against JAMES CLARK, JR. ( Filing fee $ 405 receipt number ANCMDC-3801856.), filed by CONCRETE ACCESSORIES OF GA, INC.. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit A- CONAC Demand Letter to James Clark, #2 Exhibit B- Clark Expenses for weekending 1_13_2024, #3 Exhibit C- RE_ Concrete Accessories of GA Inc., #4 Exhibit D- Ontario Canada Sales Territory Email (Redacted), #5 Exhibit E- Dual utility anchors Email (Redacted), #6 Exhibit F- Study Email (Redacted), #7 Exhibit G- FW_ availability of items (Redacted to file publicly), #8 Exhibit H- CSI group review Email (Redacted), #9 Exhibit I- Conac-SynopsisLetter, #10 Exhibit J- Jump List Excerpts, #11 Exhibit K- CONAC Demand Letter to ALP Supply, #12 Exhibit L- USB Devices Report)(KLASS, DAVID) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the North Carolina Middle District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Search for this case: CONCRETE ACCESSORIES OF GA, INC. v. CLARK, JR. | |
---|---|
Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
Search Web | [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Plaintiff: CONCRETE ACCESSORIES OF GA, INC. | |
Represented By: | DAVID I. KLASS |
Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Defendant: JAMES CLARK, JR. | |
Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.