ALLGOOD v. O'MALLEY
Plaintiff: MICHAEL ALLGOOD
Defendant: MARTIN O'MALLEY
Case Number: 1:2024cv00548
Filed: July 2, 2024
Court: US District Court for the Middle District of North Carolina
Presiding Judge: L PATRICK AULD
Nature of Suit: Social Security: DIWC/DIWW
Cause of Action: 42 U.S.C. ยง 405 Review of HHS Decision (DIWC)
Jury Demanded By: None
Docket Report

This docket was last retrieved on August 30, 2024. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.

Date Filed Document Text
August 30, 2024 Opinion or Order Filing 5 ORDER REQUIRING RESPONSE REGARDING REFERENCE TO A MAGISTRATE JUDGE. Because resolution of social security cases by a magistrate Judge on consent maintains the just, speedy, and inexpensive determination of these cases and results in a quicker resolution of the appeal than the report and recommendation process, the parties are encouraged to consider the consent option, and its time savings for litigants. IT IS ORDERED that counsel for each Party consult with their clients concerning the foregoing and complete and return the attached MDNC Form 85 within 30 days informing the Clerk's Office as to whether or not they consent to disposition by a U.S. Magistrate Judge. Unrepresented parties must also return the form. Entered at the direction of the Chief Judge. (Attachments: #1 Consent form)(at)
August 30, 2024 Filing 4 NOTICE to Parties in Social Security Case: Plaintiff's Dispositive Brief - SSA due by 9/30/2024. Defendant's Dispositive Brief - SSA due by 10/29/2024. Plaintiff's Reply Brief - SSA due by 11/12/2024. (at)
August 30, 2024 Filing 3 SEALED Answer/Certified Administrative Record - Social Security Case filed by Defendant MARTIN O'MALLEY. The record is available in paper format at the Clerk's Office (Attachments: #1 Part 2)(FELDMAN, WILLIAM)
August 30, 2024 Filing 2 NOTICE of Attorney Appearance by attorney WILLIAM FELDMAN on behalf of Defendant MARTIN O'MALLEY (FELDMAN, WILLIAM)
July 3, 2024 Case ASSIGNED to UNASSIGNED and MAG/JUDGE L. PATRICK AULD. (cc)
July 3, 2024 Text Notice of Service in the Social Security Case Pursuant to the Supplemental Rules for Social Security Actions under 42 U.S.C. 405(g), Rule 3. The Clerk has issued a Notice of Electronic Filing (NEF) using the Case Management and Electronic Case Filing (CM/ECF) system, notifying the appropriate Regional Social Security Administration Office of the General Counsel and the United States Attorney's Office of the case. No summonses shall issue. Answer due 60 days from filing on this notice. Answer/Certified Administrative Record due by 9/3/2024. (cc)
July 2, 2024 Filing 1 COMPLAINT against MARTIN O'MALLEY ( Filing fee $ 405 receipt number ANCMDC-3863659.), filed by MICHAEL ALLGOOD. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit A: Notice of Appeal Council Action)(BOWLING, RUSSELL)

Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the North Carolina Middle District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: ALLGOOD v. O'MALLEY
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: MARTIN O'MALLEY
Represented By: WILLIAM FELDMAN
Represented By: US ATTORNEY'S OFFICE-SOCIAL SECURITY NOTICING
Represented By: SSA NOTICING
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: MICHAEL ALLGOOD
Represented By: RUSSELL R. BOWLING
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?