Pitrolo v. County of Buncombe, et al.
| 1:2006cv00199 |
| June 22, 2006 |
| US District Court for the Western District of North Carolina |
| Civil Rights: Jobs Office |
| Dennis Howell |
| Lacy Thornburg |
| Defendant |
| Federal Question |
| 28:451 Employment Discrimination |
Follow case documents by RSS
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing
122
ORDER denying 111 Motion for Recusal; denying 117 Motion to Vacate; denying 120 Motion to Vacate. Signed by District Judge Martin Reidinger on 02/13/13. (emw)
|
|
Filing
110
ORDER denying 89 Motion for Declaratory Relief, Attorneys Fees and Costs. Signed by District Judge Martin Reidinger on 10/1/12. (ejb)
|
|
Filing
107
ORDER that on or before thirty (30) days from entry of this Order, the parties may supplement their filings in connection with re 89 MOTION for Attorney Fees , Costs and Declaratory Relief, 90 Memorandum in Support of Motion, 92 Response in Opposition to Motion, pleadings not to exceed ten (10) double-spaced pages in size fourteen (14) font. Signed by District Judge Martin Reidinger on February 8, 2011. Modified text on 2/8/2011 (jhg)
|
|
Filing
95
AMENDED JUDGMENT in favor of Britt Lovin, County of Buncombe, NC, Dean Kahl, Loyd Kirk against Melanie Pitrolo. IT IS, THEREFORE, ORDERED, ADJUDGED, AND DECREED that the Plaintiff recover nothing from the Defendants, the action is hereby DISMISSED WITH PREJUDICE in its entirety, and the Defendants shallrecover their costs of the action from the Plaintiff. Signed by District Judge Lacy Thornburg on August 20, 2009. (jhg)
|
|
Filing
88
ORDER re 86 MOTION for Judgment as a Matter of Law RENEWED MOTION Plaintiff file a response, if any, to Defendants motion for judgment as a matter of law, on or before August 17, 2009, and Defendant shall file a reply, if any, on or before August 21, 2009.. Signed by District Judge Lacy Thornburg on August 6, 2009. (jhg)
|
|
Filing
85
JUDGMENT AFTER JURY VERDICT. IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that in the event Plaintiff contends she is entitled to recover attorney fees and costs she must pursue such relief, by the filing of appropriate motions and supporting docum entation on or before AUGUST 7, 2009; responses to Plaintiffs motions shall be filed on or before AUGUST 17, 2009. NO REPLIES TO RESPONSES WILL BE PERMITTED. The Court finds this shortened briefing schedule necessary in order to resolve these issues before the undersigneds planned retirement on August 31, 2009. Signed by District Judge Lacy Thornburg on July 28, 2009. (jhg) Modified on 7/28/2009 (jhg). NEF REGENERATED.
|
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
| Search for this case: Pitrolo v. County of Buncombe, et al. | |
|---|---|
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
