Borgwarner, Inc. et al v. Honeywell International, Inc.
Plaintiff: Borgwarner, Inc. and Borgwarner Turbo Systems, Inc.
Defendant: Honeywell International, Inc.
Case Number: 1:2007cv00184
Filed: May 25, 2007
Court: US District Court for the Western District of North Carolina
Office: Asheville Office
County: Buncombe
Presiding Judge: Dennis Howell
Presiding Judge: Lacy Thornburg
Nature of Suit: Patent
Cause of Action: 35 U.S.C. ยง 145 Patent Infringement
Jury Demanded By: Plaintiff

Available Case Documents

The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:

Date Filed Document Text
May 13, 2011 Opinion or Order Filing 267 ORDER that this matter is hereby stayed pending further Order of the Court. Signed by District Judge Martin Reidinger on 5/13/2011. (pdf)
May 9, 2011 Opinion or Order Filing 243 ORDER granting 240 Motion for juror information. Signed by District Judge Martin Reidinger on May 9, 2011. (jhg)
March 30, 2011 Opinion or Order Filing 205 ORDER granting 192 Motion for Leave to Appear Pro Hac Vice added Christopher Nalevanko for Honeywell International, Inc. Signed by District Judge Martin Reidinger on March 29, 2011. (jhg)
March 29, 2011 Opinion or Order Filing 202 ORDER granting 197 Motion for Leave to Appear Pro Hac Vice added Zhuanjia Gu for Honeywell International, Inc. Signed by District Judge Martin Reidinger on March 29, 2011. (jhg)
March 23, 2011 Opinion or Order Filing 198 ORDER denying 191 Motion to reschedule the pretrial conference. Signed by District Judge Martin Reidinger on March 23, 2011. (jhg)
September 27, 2010 Opinion or Order Filing 189 ORDER denying 100 Motion for Summary Judgment ; denying 109 Motion for Summary Judgment of Invalidity of the Patents-In-Suit. Signed by District Judge Martin Reidinger on 9/25/2010. (pdf)
July 15, 2010 Opinion or Order Filing 184 ORDER granting 183 Motion for Leave to Appear Pro Hac Vice added Leeron G. Kalay for BorgWarner, Inc., Borgwarner Turbo Systems, Inc. Signed by District Judge Martin Reidinger on July 15, 2010. (jhg)
April 13, 2010 Opinion or Order Filing 180 ORDER granting 176 Motion to Seal Document. Signed by District Judge Martin Reidinger on 4/13/2010. (pdf)
April 2, 2010 Opinion or Order Filing 175 ORDER granting 172 Motion to Seal. Signed by District Judge Martin Reidinger on 4/1/2010. (pdf)
February 26, 2010 Opinion or Order Filing 168 ORDER granting 166 Motion to Seal Document. Signed by District Judge Martin Reidinger on 02/25/10. (emw)
December 22, 2009 Opinion or Order Filing 162 ORDER granting 158 Motion to Seal. Signed by District Judge Martin Reidinger on December 22, 2009. (pdf)
December 14, 2009 Opinion or Order Filing 146 ORDER granting 127 Motion to Seal; granting 127 Motion to Seal Document ; granting 139 Motion to Seal. Signed by District Judge Martin Reidinger on December 11, 2009. (pdf)
November 25, 2009 Opinion or Order Filing 126 ORDER granting 108 Motion to FILE UNDER Seal certain pleadings. Signed by District Judge Martin Reidinger on November 24, 2009. (jhg)
March 13, 2009 Opinion or Order Filing 84 ORDER granting 81 Motion for Leave to Appear Pro Hac Vice added Stuart M. Rosenberg for BorgWarner, Inc. and Borgwarner Turbo Systems, Inc., Corrin N. Drakulich for BorgWarner, Inc. and Borgwarner Turbo Systems, Inc.; granting 82 Motion for Leave to Appear Pro Hac Vice added Stuart M. Rosenberg for BorgWarner, Inc. and Borgwarner Turbo Systems, Inc., Corrin N. Drakulich for BorgWarner, Inc. and Borgwarner Turbo Systems, Inc.. Signed by District Judge Martin Reidinger on March 13, 2009. (pdf)
February 20, 2009 Opinion or Order Filing 79 ORDER granting 57 Motion for Claim Construction ; granting 58 Motion for Claim Construction. Signed by District Judge Martin Reidinger on 2/20/09. (pdf) (Additional attachment(s) added on 2/20/2009: # 1 Main Document added correct PDF and deleted incorrect PDF) (pdf). Modified on 2/20/2009 (pdf). Regenerated NEF
December 29, 2008 Opinion or Order Filing 78 ORDER granting 77 Motion for Leave to Appear Pro Hac Vice added Erin E. Kaiser for BorgWarner, Inc., Borgwarner Turbo Systems, Inc. Signed by District Judge Martin Reidinger on December 29, 2008. (jhg)
November 25, 2008 Opinion or Order Filing 76 ORDER granting 75 Motion for Leave to Appear Pro Hac Vice added Katherine D. Prescott for BorgWarner, Inc., Borgwarner Turbo Systems, Inc. Signed by District Judge Martin Reidinger on 11/25/08. (ejb)
February 8, 2008 Opinion or Order Filing 44 PROTECTIVE ORDER. Signed by District Judge Martin Karl Reidinger on 2/8/08. (jhg)
Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the North Carolina Western District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: Borgwarner, Inc. et al v. Honeywell International, Inc.
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: Borgwarner, Inc.
Represented By: Larry Stephen McDevitt
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: Borgwarner Turbo Systems, Inc.
Represented By: Larry Stephen McDevitt
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Honeywell International, Inc.
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?