USA v. 57 Candler Heights Rd.
United States of America |
57 Candler Heights Road |
1:2007cv00338 |
October 23, 2007 |
US District Court for the Western District of North Carolina |
Asheville Office |
Buncombe |
Dennis Howell |
Lacy Thornburg |
Drug Related Seizure of Property |
21 U.S.C. ยง 881 Forfeiture Property - Real Estate |
None |
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
Document Text |
---|
Filing 29 ORDER OF FORFEITURE AND DISMISSAL CASE. Signed by District Judge Lacy Thornburg on February 6, 2009. (jhg) |
Filing 27 ORDER that the parties show cause, why this complaint should not be dismissed within 10 days of entry of this Order. Signed by District Judge Lacy Thornburg on December 19, 2008. (jhg) |
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Search for this case: USA v. 57 Candler Heights Rd. | |
---|---|
Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
Search Web | [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Plaintiff: United States of America | |
Represented By: | Thomas R Ascik |
Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Defendant: 57 Candler Heights Road | |
Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.