United States v. $23,713.00 in United States Currency

Plaintiff: United States
Defendant: $23,713.00 in United States Currency
Case Number: 1:2007cv00377
Filed: November 29, 2007
Court: North Carolina Western District Court
Office: Asheville Office
County: Buncombe
0 Judge:
Referring Judge: Dennis Howell
Presiding Judge: Lacy Thornburg
Nature of Suit: Forfeit/Penalty: Other
Cause of Action: 21:0881 Property Forfeiture
Jury Demanded By: None

Available Case Documents

The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:

Date Filed#Document Text
February 17, 2009 9 Opinion or Order of the Court ORDER LIFTING STAY, and deadline for Cherokee Trading Post, Inc., Ivy, LLC, and Jack Willis Shepherd to file a claim, answer, and/or any other pleading or responsive motion shall begin running from date this Order is signed. Signed by Magistrate Judge Dennis Howell on 2/17/09. (ejb)

Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the North Carolina Western District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: United States v. $23,713.00 in United States Currency
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: United States
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: $23,713.00 in United States Currency
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.