Krumroy et al v. Hobart Brothers Company et al
| Carl H Krumroy and Harriet H Krumroy |
| Hobart Brothers Company, Honeywell International, Inc., Industrial Holdings Corporation, Ingersoll-Rand Company, The Lincoln Electric Company, Metropolitan Life Insurance Company and Rapid American Corporation |
| 1:2009cv00167 |
| May 1, 2009 |
| US District Court for the Western District of North Carolina |
| Asheville Office |
| Iredell |
| Lacy Thornburg |
| P.I. : Asbestos |
| 28 U.S.C. ยง 1332 Diversity-Asbestos Litigation |
| Defendant |
Follow case documents by RSS
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing
31
ORDER granting 30 Motion to Dismiss with prejudice as to Defendant Metropolitan Life Insurance Company. On or before five (5) business days from entry of this Order, the Defendant Honeywell International, Inc. shall file response explaining why the settlement proceeds have not been distributed or shall file proof of distribution of the same. Signed by District Judge Martin Reidinger on 03/14/2013. (thh)
|
|
Filing
29
ORDER granting 28 Motion for Leave to Appear Pro Hac Vice added George Mark Phillips for Honeywell International, Inc. Signed by District Judge Martin Reidinger on 12/12/12. (emw)
|
|
Filing
20
ORDER granting 18 Motion for Leave to Appear Pro Hac Vice added William T. Hassler for Metropolitan Life Insurance Company. Signed by District Judge Martin Reidinger on 06/28/2012. (thh)
|
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
