Wood v. N. C. Dept. of Correction, et al et al
Plaintiff: Joshua Cain Wood
Defendant: Dr. Robert Uhren and Nurse Willy
Case Number: 1:2009cv00353
Filed: September 8, 2009
Court: US District Court for the Western District of North Carolina
Office: Asheville Office
County: Yancey
Presiding Judge: Graham Mullen
Nature of Suit: None
Cause of Action: Prisoner Civil Rights
Jury Demanded By: None

Available Case Documents

The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:

Date Filed Document Text
February 3, 2010 Opinion or Order Filing 33 CLERK'S JUDGMENT is hereby entered in accordance with the Court's Order dated 2/3/10. Signed by Deputy Clerk.
January 8, 2010 Opinion or Order Filing 31 Order that the Plaintiff has twenty(20) days from the filing of this Order in which to provide his own documents, affidavits, or declarations countering the evidence offered by the Defendants Motion for Summary Judgment. Signed by Senior Judge Graham Mullen on 1/8/10. (siw)
November 23, 2009 Opinion or Order Filing 22 ORDER - 1. That the parties have forty-five (45) days from the date of this Order in which to file any dispositive motions which they may choose to file. However, in the event that either party chooses not to file a dispositiv e motion, such party shall advise the Court of that decision within fourteen (14) days of the date of this Order; and 2. That in the event any such dispositive motion is filed, the opposing party shall have thirty (30) days from the date of that part ys receipt of that motion in which to file a response with this Court. 3. Plaintiff shall file a response to Defendant Uhrens Motion to Dismiss no later than thirty (30) days from the date of this Oder. Plaintiff may not allege new facts surrounding the events in question as part of the reply. Plaintiff should base the reply and argument(s) solely on the matters set forth in the original Complaint and/or those set forth in the Defendant Uhrens Motion. FAILURE TO RESPOND WITHIN THIS TIME PERIOD MAY SUBJECT THIS ACTION TO DISMISSAL.. Signed by Senior Judge Graham Mullen on 11/23/09. (siw)
September 9, 2009 Opinion or Order Filing 2 ORDER that Defendants Mr. David Mitchell and the North Carolina Department of Corrections are dismissed; The Clerk shall issue summons and deliver it forthwith to the U.S. Marshall who will make service of process without additional cost; and Defendants shall file an Answer to Plaintiffs Complaint in accordance with the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure. Signed by Senior Judge Graham Mullen on 9/9/09. (siw)
Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the North Carolina Western District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: Wood v. N. C. Dept. of Correction, et al et al
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: Joshua Cain Wood
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Dr. Robert Uhren
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Nurse Willy
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?