Isenhour v. Wal-Mart Stores East, L.P.
Plaintiff: Jada Lynne Herman Isenhour
Defendant: Wal-Mart Stores East, L.P.
Case Number: 1:2009cv00462
Filed: December 22, 2009
Court: US District Court for the Western District of North Carolina
Office: Asheville Office
County: Burke
Presiding Judge: Dennis Howell
Presiding Judge: Martin Reidinger
Nature of Suit: P.I.: Other
Cause of Action: Diversity - Notice of Removal
Jury Demanded By: Both

Available Case Documents

The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:

Date Filed Document Text
January 25, 2010 Opinion or Order Filing 4 ORDER granting 3 Motion to Remand to State Court. Signed by Magistrate Judge Dennis Howell on 1/22/10. (siw)
Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the North Carolina Western District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: Isenhour v. Wal-Mart Stores East, L.P.
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Wal-Mart Stores East, L.P.
Represented By: Justin N. Davis
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: Jada Lynne Herman Isenhour
Represented By: Wayne W. Martin
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?