Jones v. Buncombe County et al
Rodney Moucell Jones |
Buncombe County, Ron Moore, FNU Hanse and Van Duncan |
1:2010cv00042 |
February 9, 2010 |
US District Court for the Western District of North Carolina |
Asheville Office |
Buncombe |
Graham Mullen |
Civil Rights: Other |
Prisoner Civil Rights |
None |
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
Document Text |
---|
Filing 38 ORDER denying 29 Motion to Alter Judgment; denying 29 Motion to Amend/Correct; denying 29 Motion for Leave to File; denying 36 Motion for Reconsideration. Signed by Senior Judge Graham Mullen on July 13, 2010. (Pro se litigant served by US Mail.)(jhg) |
Filing 28 CLERK'S JUDGMENT is hereby entered in accordance with the Court's Order dated 5/14/10. Signed by direction of Frank G. Johns, Clerk.(siw) |
Filing 20 ORDER - Plaintiff is advised that you have thirty (30) days from the filing of this Order in which to file your reply in opposition to Defendants Motion to Dismiss. FAILURE TO RESPOND WITHIN THIS TIME PERIOD MAY SUBJECT THIS A CTION TODISMISSAL. THEREFORE, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that the Plaintiff has thirty (30) days from the filing of this Order in which to provide his own documents, affidavits, or declarations countering the evidence offered by Defendant Moore and Hansens Motion to Dismiss.. Signed by Senior Judge Graham Mullen on 4/7/10. (siw) |
Filing 16 ORDER that the Plaintiff has thirty (30) days from the filing of this Order in which to provide his own documents, affidavits, or declarations countering the evidence offered by Defendants Motion to Dismiss. Signed by Senior Judge Graham Mullen on 3/19/10. (siw) |
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.