Bridges v. Keller et al
Plaintiff: Danny Ray Bridges
Defendant: Alvin W. Keller, Jr., John Doe, I, S Kiley, Bob Haggard, John Morgan, John Doe #2 and Keith Kuhne
Case Number: 1:2010cv00113
Filed: June 2, 2010
Court: US District Court for the Western District of North Carolina
Office: Asheville Office
County: Avery
Nature of Suit: Civil Rights
Cause of Action: Prisoner Civil Rights
Jury Demanded By: Plaintiff

Available Case Documents

The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:

Date Filed Document Text
August 7, 2012 Opinion or Order Filing 84 CLERK'S JUDGMENT is hereby entered in accordance with the Court's Order dated 8/7/12. Signed by Clerk, Frank G. Johns. (nll)
January 13, 2012 Opinion or Order Filing 79 MEMORANDUM AND RECOMMENDATION AND ORDER: ORDER granting in part denying in part 74 MOTION to Strike 73 Reply Brief...or Alternatively, Motion for Leave to File Limited Surreply; All further proceedings in this action, in cluding all discovery, are STAYED pending District Judge's ruling on this Memorandum and Recommendation and Order. MEMORANDUM AND RECOMMENDATIONS: re 68 MOTION to Dismiss for Failure to State a Claim filed by Robert Haggard, Paula Y. Smith, Alvin W. Keller, Jr., and 65 MOTION to Dismiss for Failure to State a Claim Motion to Dismiss First Amended Complaint filed by Payton Turpin, Anthony D. Searles, Albert Keith Kuhne ( Objections to M&R due by 1/30/2012). Signed by Magistrate Judge David S. Cayer on 1/12/12. (ejb)
November 8, 2011 Opinion or Order Filing 72 ORDER granting 71 Unopposed MOTION for Extension of Time to File Response/Reply re: 68 MOTION to Dismiss for Failure to State a Claim by Keller, Haggard and Smith by Danny Ray Bridges to State a Claim of Defendants Haggard, Keller and Smith is extended through and including Wednesday, 11/23/11. SO ORDERED. Signed by Magistrate Judge David S. Cayer on 11/8/11. (nll) Modified text and docket entry relationship on 11/8/2011. NEF Regenerated (nll).
February 3, 2011 Opinion or Order Filing 39 ORDER adopting Memorandum and Recommendations re 32 Memorandum and Recommendations.; affirming 32 Order of Magistrate Judge; denying without prejudice 14 Motion for Summary Judgment ; denying 20 Motion to Dismiss; FURTHER ORDERED Plaintiff's claims against John Morgan, F.N.P. dismissed without prejudice, and Plaintiff's claim for injunctive relief dismissed without prejudice. Signed by District Judge Martin Reidinger on 2/3/11. (siw)
January 3, 2011 Opinion or Order Filing 32 MEMORANDUM AND RECOMMENDATION AND ORDER: ORDER granting 24 Pltf's "MOTION for Limited Expedited Discovery..."; and MEMORANDUM AND RECOMMENDATIONS re 14 MOTION for Summary Judgment filed by Bob Haggard, S. Killey, Alvin W. Keller, Jr., 20 MOTION to Dismiss filed by Payton Turpin, Albert Kuhne, Keith Kuhne, John Morgan ( Objections to M&R due by 1/21/2011). Signed by Magistrate Judge David S. Cayer on 1/3/11. (ejb)
August 4, 2010 Opinion or Order Filing 16 ORDER OF RECUSAL. The undersigned recuses himself from further participation in this matter and instructed the Clerk of this court to assign the referral to another magistrate judge. Signed by Magistrate Judge Dennis Howell on 8/3/10. (siw)
Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the North Carolina Western District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: Bridges v. Keller et al
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Alvin W. Keller, Jr.
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: John Doe, I
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: S Kiley
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Bob Haggard
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: John Morgan
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: John Doe #2
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Keith Kuhne
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: Danny Ray Bridges
Represented By: Rodney E. Alexander
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?