Moorehead v. Keller et al
| Jackie Emmitt Moorehead |
| Alvin W. Keller, Jr., Robert C. Lewis and R. David Mitchell |
| 1:2010cv00131 |
| June 22, 2010 |
| US District Court for the Western District of North Carolina |
| Asheville Office |
| Mitchell |
| Graham Mullen |
| Civil Rights |
| Prisoner Civil Rights |
| None |
Follow case documents by RSS
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing
98
CLERK'S JUDGMENT is hereby entered in accordance with the Court's Order dated 02/29/12. Signed by Clerk, Frank G. Johns.(Pro se litigant served by US Mail.)(emw)
|
|
Filing
49
ORDER granting 36 Motion for Leave to File an amended complaint, construed as a motion to Supplement; dismissing 46 Motion to Amend/Correct; denying 17 Motion to Produce documents; denying 30 Motion for injunction; gra nting 31 Motion to Amend motion for injunction; denying 32 Motion to compel discovery; granting 34 Motion for Leave to File an amended complaint. Signed by Chief Judge Robert J. Conrad, Jr on October 27, 2010. (Pro se litigant served by US Mail.)(jhg)
|
|
Filing
12
ORDER granting 4 Motion Amend Complaint by adding party. Signed by Senior Judge Graham Mullen on 07/15/2010. (Pro se litigant served by US Mail.)(thh)
|
|
Filing
3
ORDER that the Clerk shall issue summons and deliver itforthwith to the U. S. Marshal who will make service of process without additional cost. re 1 Complaint. Signed by Senior Judge Graham Mullen on 06/30/2010. (Pro se litigant served by US Mail.)(thh)
|
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
