Gaddy v. Yelton et al
Plaintiff: |
Robert D. Gaddy, Jr. |
Defendant: |
W. M. Yelton, Doug Sheehan, Ervin Hunter, Jimmy Stover, Nicholas Ryan Mitchell and City of Asheville |
Case Number: |
1:2010cv00214 |
Filed: |
September 29, 2010 |
Court: |
US District Court for the Western District of North Carolina |
Office: |
Asheville Office |
County: |
Alexander |
Presiding Judge: |
Dennis Howell |
Presiding Judge: |
Martin Reidinger |
Nature of Suit: |
Other Civil Rights |
Cause of Action: |
28 U.S.C. § 1331 |
Jury Demanded By: |
Plaintiff |
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
Date Filed |
Document Text |
August 27, 2012 |
Filing
51
ORDER denying 43 Motion for Summary Judgment. Signed by District Judge Martin Reidinger on 8/27/12. (ejb)
|
August 16, 2011 |
Filing
31
MEMORANDUM OF DECISION AND ORDER, that the Plaintiffs Written Objections to the Memorandum and Recommendation [Doc. 29] are OVERRULED; accepting Magistrate Judge's 28 Memorandum and Recommendations.; granting 21 Moti on to Dismiss, and the following claims set forth in the Plaintiffs Amended Complaint are hereby DISMISSED: (1) The claims brought pursuant to 42 U.S.C. § 1983 against Defendants Yelton, Sheehan, Mitchell, Hunter, and Stover in their official ca pacities; (2) The claims brought pursuant to 42 U.S.C. § 1983 against the City of Asheville; (3) The North Carolina tort claims of negligence, gross negligence, trespass by a public officer, and malicious prosecution brought against the City and the Individual Defendants in their official capacities; and (4) The claim asserted in the Sixth Claim for Relief for deprivation of substantive due process in violation of the North Carolina Constitution. This case shall proceed on the Plaintiffs & #167; 1983 and state law tort claims against the Individual Defendants in their individual capacities. IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that the parties shall conduct an Initial Attorneys Conference within fourteen (14) days of this Order and file a Certificate of Initial Attorneys Conference with the Court within seven (7) days thereafter. Signed by District Judge Martin Reidinger on 8/16/11. (siw)
|
January 28, 2011 |
Filing
24
ORDER granting 23 Motion to Stay Initial Attorneys Conference, and the IAC is STAYED until 14 days after final disposition of the Motion to Dismiss by the district court. Signed by Magistrate Judge Dennis Howell on January 28, 2011. (jhg)
|
January 4, 2011 |
Filing
17
ORDER administratively denying as moot without prejudice Defts' 11 Motion to Dismiss. Signed by Magistrate Judge Dennis Howell on 1/4/11. (ejb)
|
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system.
A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the North Carolina Western District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?