White v. Hoyle et al
Anthony Leo White |
David Hoyle, Cale Johnson, David Warlick, Donnie Dellinger and Rick Hasson |
1:2011cv00117 |
May 17, 2011 |
US District Court for the Western District of North Carolina |
Asheville Office |
Burke |
Robert J. Conrad |
Civil Rights |
Prisoner Civil Rights |
None |
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
Document Text |
---|
Filing 35 CLERK'S JUDGMENT is hereby entered in accordance with the Court's Order dated 03/02/2012. Signed by Clerk, Frank G. Johns. (Pro se litigant served by US Mail.)(ejb) |
Filing 33 ORDER denying 32 Plaintiff's Motion to produce copies at no charge re 28 Letter, 31 Letter. Signed by Chief Judge Robert J. Conrad, Jr on 02/08/2012. (Pro se litigant served by US Mail.)(thh) |
Filing 20 ORDER that plaintiff has thirty (30) days from entry of this Order to file his response to both motions to dismiss re 16 MOTION to Dismiss, 19 MOTION to Dismiss for Failure To State a Claim for Which Relief Can Be Grant ed MOTION to Dismiss for Lack of Jurisdiction pursuant to F.R.Civ. P. 12(b)(1) and 12(b)(2) MOTION to Dismiss for Lack of Jurisdiction pursuant to F.R.Civ. P. 12(b)(1) and 12(b)(2). Signed by Chief Judge Robert J. Conrad, Jr on 7/28/2011. (Pro se litigant served by US Mail.)(pdf) |
Filing 2 ORDER Clerk shall issue summons for each Deft and deliver it to US Marshall who will make service of process without additional cost; Defts shall file an Answer to claims in Pltfs Complaint in accordance with F.R.Cv.P. Signed by Chief Judge Robert J. Conrad, Jr on 6/1/11. (Pro se litigant served by US Mail.)(ejb) |
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.