Synovus Bank v. Rantzos et al
Synovus Bank |
Kostas N. Rantzos and Emily A. Rantzos |
1:2011cv00191 |
July 29, 2011 |
US District Court for the Western District of North Carolina |
Asheville Office |
Henderson |
Dennis Howell |
Martin Reidinger |
Negotiable Instrument |
28 U.S.C. ยง 1332 |
None |
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
Document Text |
---|
Filing 42 PROTECTIVE ORDER. Signed by District Judge Martin Reidinger on 07/11/2013. (Pro se litigant served by US Mail.)(thh) |
Filing 40 ORDER that the parties shall file a stipulation of dismissal within thirty (30) days of the entry of this Order. Signed by District Judge Martin Reidinger on 07/05/13. (Pro se litigant served by US Mail.)(emw) |
Filing 36 ORDER granting 35 Motion for Leave to Appear Pro Hac Vice added Timothy Ryan Langley for Emily A. Rantzos and Kostas N. Rantzos. Signed by Magistrate Judge Dennis Howell on 04/09/13. (emw) |
Filing 34 ORDER granting 33 Motion for Leave to Appear Pro Hac Vice added T. William McGee, III for Synovus Bank. Signed by Magistrate Judge Dennis Howell on 3/27/13. (ejb) |
Filing 32 ORDER denying Motion for Leave to File Motion for Leave to Present Consolidated Motions for Pro Hac Vice Admission by Synovus Bank (Doc. 77 filed in case no. 1:11cv66). Signed by Magistrate Judge Dennis Howell on 3/12/13. (nll) |
Filing 21 MEMORANDUM OF DECISION AND ORDER granting 13 Motion to Dismiss; granting in part and denying in part 15 Motion to Dismiss; parties to conduct an initial attorneys' conference within 14 days. (SEE ORDER FOR DETAILS). Signed by District Judge Martin Reidinger on 8/15/12. (ejb) |
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.