Collins v. Volz et al
Deanna Kay Collins |
Karen C. Volz, Travis Volz and Christopher R. Stewart |
1:2012cv00045 |
March 7, 2012 |
US District Court for the Western District of North Carolina |
Asheville Office |
Burke |
Dennis Howell |
Martin Reidinger |
Copyrights |
28 U.S.C. ยง 1338 |
None |
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
Document Text |
---|
Filing 52 ORDER granting in part and denying in part 51 Motion for Attorney Fees. Signed by District Judge Martin Reidinger on 4/29/13. (Pro se litigant served by US Mail.)(bsw) |
Filing 49 CLERK'S JUDGMENT is hereby entered in accordance with the Court's Order dated 1/29/2013. Signed by Clerk, Frank G. Johns. (Pro se litigant served by US Mail.) (ejb) |
Filing 42 ORDER denying 10 Motion in Opposition of Court Order of May 4, 2012-"Extension of Time to Answer", construed as a Motion to Reconsider; withdrawing 12 & 13 Motions for Sanctions; denying 14 Motion for Dis closure; withdrawing 15 Motion for Sanctions; denying 16 Motion for Recusal; granting 29 & 30 Motions to Withdraw Doc. 12 & Doc. 13; denying 31 Ex Parte Motion & 32 second Ex Parte Motion; granting in part and denying in part Pltf' ;s 23 Notice of Refusal to Proceed before a Magistrate Judge and 33 Motion: Refusal to Consent to Proceed before a Magistrate Judge; FURTHER ORDERED on or before 21 days from entry of this Order, Pltf may file Response to Defts' Motion to Dismiss; on or before 14 days from filing of Response by Pltf, Defts may file a Reply Brief. (see Order for further details) Signed by District Judge Martin Reidinger on 6/28/12. (Pro se litigant served by US Mail.)(ejb) |
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.