Boulware v. USA
Vincent Lamar Boulware |
USA |
1:2012cv00068 |
April 9, 2012 |
US District Court for the Western District of North Carolina |
Asheville Office |
RutherFord |
Martin Reidinger |
Motions to Vacate Sentence |
28 U.S.C. ยง 2255 |
None |
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
Document Text |
---|
Filing 23 MEMORANDUM OF DECISION AND ORDER denying 22 Motion for Reconsideration. Court declines to grant a certificate of appealability. Signed by District Judge Martin Reidinger on 09/18/2014. (Pro se litigant served by US Mail.) (klb) |
Filing 21 CLERK'S JUDGMENT is hereby entered in accordance with the Court's Memorandum of Decision and Order dated 2/3/2014. Signed by Clerk, Frank G. Johns. (Pro se litigant served by US Mail.)(ejb) |
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Search for this case: Boulware v. USA | |
---|---|
Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
Search Web | [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Petitioner: Vincent Lamar Boulware | |
Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Respondent: USA | |
Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.