Bullard v. Lewis et al
| Gregory Lamont Bullard El |
| Robert Lewis and Susan White |
| 1:2012cv00169 |
| July 30, 2012 |
| US District Court for the Western District of North Carolina |
| Asheville Office |
| Mitchell |
| Robert J. Conrad |
| Civil Rights |
| Prisoner Civil Rights |
| None |
Follow case documents by RSS
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing
18
ORDER denying 16 Motion for injunctive relief w/o prejudice. Signed by Chief Judge Robert J. Conrad, Jr on 4/29/13. (Pro se litigant served by US Mail.)(bsw)
|
|
Filing
17
ORDER that Petitioners application to proceed in forma pauperis is ALLOWED and the $5.00 filing fee is waived. Signed by Chief Judge Robert J. Conrad, Jr on 11/20/2012. (Pro se litigant served by US Mail.)(thh)
|
|
Filing
14
ORDER rescinding 3 Order Directing Monthly Prisoner Payment re $350 filing fee. Signed by the Clerk of Court on 10/23/12 (Pro se litigant served by US Mail.) (ejb) Modified text on 10/23/2012 to show signer of Order (ejb). NEF Regenerated.
|
|
Filing
11
CLERK'S JUDGMENT is hereby entered in accordance with the Court's Order dated 9/19/12. Signed by Clerk, Frank G. Johns. (Pro se litigant served by US Mail.)(com)
|
|
Filing
7
ORDER Pltf has 14 days from date of this Order to contest re-characterization of his 1 Complaint as a 2254 Petition or inform the Court that he would like to dismiss this suit. Signed by Chief Judge Robert J. Conrad, Jr on 8/13/12. (Pro se litigant served by US Mail.) (ejb)
|
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
