Lo v. Emery Corporation
Tou Ger Lo |
Emery Corporation |
1:2012cv00176 |
July 17, 2012 |
US District Court for the Western District of North Carolina |
Asheville Office |
Burke |
Dennis Howell |
Martin Reidinger |
Employment |
28 U.S.C. ยง 1331 |
Plaintiff |
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
Document Text |
---|
Filing 11 ORDER granting in part 3 Motion to Dismiss; approving 10 Memorandum and Recommendations. State law claims remaining REMANDED to the General Court of Justice, Superior Court Division, for Burke County, North Carolina, for further proceedings. Signed by District Judge Martin Reidinger on 1/3/13. (nll) Modified on 1/4/2013 (nll). NEF Regenerated. |
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Search for this case: Lo v. Emery Corporation | |
---|---|
Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
Search Web | [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Plaintiff: Tou Ger Lo | |
Represented By: | C. Gary Triggs |
Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Defendant: Emery Corporation | |
Represented By: | Stacy K. Wood |
Represented By: | Mary H. Crosby |
Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.