Reynolds Innovations Inc. v. Lee
| Reynolds Innovations Inc. |
| Cheryl Lee |
| 1:2012cv00278 |
| September 7, 2012 |
| US District Court for the Western District of North Carolina |
| Asheville Office |
| Henderson |
| Martin Reidinger |
| Trademark |
| 15 U.S.C. ยง 1114 |
| None |
Follow case documents by RSS
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing
11
FINAL JUDGMENT AND PERMANENT INJUNCTION ON CONSENT in favor of Reynolds Innovations Inc. against Cheryl Lee. Signed by District Judge Martin Reidinger on 1/19/13. (ejb) (Main Document 11 replaced on 1/23/2013 with PDF showing Judge's signature date) (ejb). NEF Regenerated (ejb).
|
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
| Search for this case: Reynolds Innovations Inc. v. Lee | |
|---|---|
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Plaintiff: Reynolds Innovations Inc. | |
| Represented By: | William M. Bryner |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Defendant: Cheryl Lee | |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
