McKinnish v. Donahoe
Plaintiff:
Kimberly J. McKinnish
Defendant:
Patrick R. Donahoe
Case Number:
1:2013cv00087
Filed:
March 28, 2013
Court:
North Carolina Western District Court
Office:
Asheville Office
County:
Henderson
Referring Judge:
Dennis Howell
Presiding Judge:
Martin Reidinger
Nature of Suit:
Civil Rights: Jobs
Cause of Action:
42:2000 Job Discrimination (Sex)
Jury Demanded By:
Plaintiff
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
Date Filed | # | Document Text |
---|---|---|
August 15, 2014 | 37 |
![]() |
June 9, 2014 | 31 |
![]() |
January 17, 2014 | 23 |
![]() |
October 2, 2013 | 16 |
![]() |
September 23, 2013 | 12 |
![]() |
September 17, 2013 | 11 |
![]() |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Search for this case: McKinnish v. Donahoe | |
---|---|
Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
Search Web | [ Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Plaintiff: Kimberly J. McKinnish | |
Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
Search Web | [ Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Defendant: Patrick R. Donahoe | |
Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
Search Web | [ Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.