Henslee v. Singleton
| Jonathan Henslee |
| FNU Singleton |
| 1:2013cv00090 |
| March 25, 2013 |
| US District Court for the Western District of North Carolina |
| Asheville Office |
| Avery |
| Robert J. Conrad |
| Prisoner: Civil Rights |
| Prisoner Civil Rights |
| Plaintiff |
Follow case documents by RSS
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing
119
CLERK'S JUDGMENT is hereby entered in accordance with the Court's Jury Verdict dated 3/28/2017. Signed by Clerk, Frank G. Johns. (eef)
|
|
Filing
104
ORDER that the Warden at Harnett Correctional Institution must transport Plaintiff so that he is present for trial to begin on Monday, March 27, 2017, at 10:00 a.m. and then return him to Harnett Correctional Institution at the conclusion of trial. IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that State Law Enforcement shall be present and responsible for maintaining custody of and ensuring safe and secure conduct by Jonathan Henslee for the duration of trial in this matter. Signed by Senior Judge Graham Mullen on 03/08/17. (emw)
|
|
Filing
90
ORDER revising 88 Order and 89 Order deadlines as noted. Signed by Senior Judge Graham Mullen on 1/3/2017. (kby)
|
|
Filing
89
ORDER on the Court's own motion that the Jury Trial is RESET for March 27, 2017 at 10:00 AM, 401 W Trade St, Charlotte, NC 28202 before Senior Judge Graham Mullen. Signed by Senior Judge Graham Mullen on 12/7/2016. (khm)
|
|
Filing
88
ORDER Regarding Trial set for Monday, March 13, 2017. Signed by Senior Judge Graham Mullen on 9/30/2016. (khm)
|
|
Filing
87
ORDER on the Court's own motion that Jury Trial is set for 3/13/2017 10:00 AM in Courtroom 2-2, 401 W Trade St, Charlotte, NC 28202 before Senior Judge Graham Mullen. Signed by Senior Judge Graham Mullen on 8/23/2016. (kby)
|
|
Filing
86
ORDER Pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 1915(e)(1), IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that Joshua D. Lanning is appointed to serve as counsel for Plaintiff in this case. Signed by Chief Judge Frank D. Whitney on 10/30/2015. (Pro se litigant served by US Mail.)(thh)
|
|
Filing
83
ORDER denying 68 Defendant's Motion for Summary Judgment ; denying 72 Motion to Strike Mike Ball's Affidavit; 74 Motion to Proceed with a Jury Trial and Opposition to Dispositive Motion(s), shall be terminat ed by the Clerk because it is in substance not a justiciable motion, but it is, rather, a response to Defendant's Motion for Summary Judgment. ; denying 76 Defendant's Motion to Strike Plaintiff's Motion to Proceed with a Jury Trial and Miscellaneous Documents Filed by Plaintiff. Signed by Chief Judge Frank D. Whitney on 08/18/15. (Pro se litigant served by US Mail.)(emw)
|
|
Filing
75
ORDER that the Defendant shall submit to the Court a memorandum in accordance with this Order within 20 days. Plaintiff shall then have ten days from service of the memorandum in which to file a response brief if he so wishes. Signed by District Judge Robert J. Conrad, Jr on 04/20/15. (Pro se litigant served by US Mail.)(emw)
|
|
Filing
63
ORDER denying 62 Motion To Proceed With A Jury Trial. The deadline for filing dispositive motions under this Court's scheduling order is December 22, 2014. Signed by District Judge Robert J. Conrad, Jr on 11/21/14. (Pro se litigant served by US Mail.)(emw)
|
|
Filing
58
ORDER denying Pltf's 40 Motion For Subpoena Duces Tecum, 50 Motion to Reconsider, for Leave to File an Amended Complaint, and 53 Motion to Compel Discovery. Deft not required to respond to any further discovery requests from Pltf at this time. Signed by District Judge Robert J. Conrad, Jr on 10/7/14. (Pro se litigant served by US Mail.)(ejb)
|
|
Filing
46
ORDER denying Plaintiff's 44 Motion for Reconsideration. Signed by District Judge Robert J. Conrad, Jr on 8/15/14. (Pro se litigant served by US Mail.)(nv)
|
|
Filing
42
ORDER denying Motions 32 Motion Seeking Fact-Finder; 36 Motion to Appoint Counsel ; 37 Motion for Leave to File Amended Complaint; 38 Motion to Compel to Produce. Signed by District Judge Robert J. Conrad, Jr on 07/28/14. (Pro se litigant served by US Mail.)(emw)
|
|
Filing
30
ORDER denying Plaintiff's 28 Motion for Default Judgment. Signed by District Judge Robert J. Conrad, Jr. on 6/2/2014. (Pro se litigant served by US Mail.)(khm)
|
|
Filing
25
ORDER denying as premature 22 Motion to Compel; granting 24 Motion for Extension of Time to Answer re 1 Complaint. FNU Singleton answer due 6/30/2014. Signed by District Judge Robert J. Conrad, Jr on 5/13/14. (Pro se litigant served by US Mail.)(ejb)
|
|
Filing
15
ORDER Pltf's 1 Complaint, survives initial review under § 1915(e) and 28 U.S.C. § 1915A; denying Pltf's 4 Motion for Writ, and 10 Motion for Default Judgment; US Marshal shall attempt to effectuate service on Deft. using the summons form provided by Pltf. Signed by District Judge Robert J. Conrad, Jr on 3/12/14. (Pro se litigant served by US Mail.)(ejb)
|
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
| Search for this case: Henslee v. Singleton | |
|---|---|
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Plaintiff: Jonathan Henslee | |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Defendant: FNU Singleton | |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
