McGuinness et al v. US Forest Service
| John McGuinness, Diane Eller, Jess V. Clampitt, Jr., Ronnie Clampitt, Earlene von der Osten, Robert von der Osten, Stephen Zucker, Nancy Mosteller, John Makar and Aurelia Stone |
| United States Forest Service |
| 1:2015cv00072 |
| April 7, 2015 |
| US District Court for the Western District of North Carolina |
| Asheville Office |
| Clay |
| Dennis Howell |
| Max O. Cogburn |
| Review or Appeal of Agency Decision |
| 30 U.S.C. ยง 181 |
| None |
Follow case documents by RSS
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing
26
CLERK'S JUDGMENT is hereby entered in accordance with the Court's Memorandum of Decision and Order dated 10/13/2016. Signed by Clerk, Frank G. Johns. (ejb)
|
|
Filing
23
ORDER re 14 MOTION for Partial Summary Judgment , 18 MOTION for Summary Judgment ( Oral Argument set for 10/3/2016 10:30 AM in Courtroom 1, 100 Otis St, Asheville, NC 28801 before District Judge Max O. Cogburn Jr.). Signed by District Judge Max O. Cogburn, Jr on 9/6/2016. (kby)
|
|
Filing
20
ORDER Continuing Bench Trial ready date for trial 10/3/2016 09:31 AM in Courtroom 1, 100 Otis St, Asheville, NC 28801 before District Judge Max O. Cogburn Jr. Signed by District Judge Max O. Cogburn, Jr on 07/29/2016. (thh)
|
|
Filing
17
ORDER granting the 16 Renewed Consent Motion to Enlarge Pretrial Order Deadlines. It is Ordered that the Pretrial Order and Case Management Plan be amended as outlined within. Signed by Magistrate Judge Dennis Howell on 6/14/2016. (kby)
|
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
