Hardin v. USA
Petitioner: Tracy Bernard Hardin
Respondent: USA
Case Number: 1:2016cv00178
Filed: June 18, 2016
Court: US District Court for the Western District of North Carolina
Office: Asheville Office
County: Cleveland
Presiding Judge: Martin Reidinger
Nature of Suit: Motions to Vacate Sentence
Cause of Action: 28 U.S.C. ยง 2255
Jury Demanded By: None
RSS Follow case documents by RSS

Available Case Documents

The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:

Date Filed Document Text
June 23, 2017 Opinion or Order Filing 9 CLERK'S JUDGMENT is hereby entered in accordance with the Court's Memorandum of Decision and Order dated 6/23/2017. Signed by Clerk, Frank G. Johns. (Pro se litigant served by US Mail.) (ejb)
May 9, 2017 Opinion or Order Filing 7 ORDER granting Counsel's 6 MOTION to Withdraw as Attorney, and Federal Public Defender of WDNC is relieved from any further representation of Petitioner. Petitioner shall have 20 days from service of this Order to respond pro se to Govt's pending 5 MOTION to Dismiss. (Responses due by 6/1/2017 plus an additional 3 days if served by mail). Signed by District Judge Martin Reidinger on 5/09/17. (Pro se litigant served by US Mail.) (ejb)
September 2, 2016 Opinion or Order Filing 4 ORDER granting 3 government's motion to place this case in abeyance; this matter is hereby held in abeyance pending the Supreme Court's decision in Beckles. Thereafter, the government shall have 60 days from the date the Supreme Court decides Beckles within which to file its response in this matter. Signed by District Judge Martin Reidinger on 09/02/2016. (thh)
Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the North Carolina Western District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.

Why Is My Information Online?