Waugh v. Advance Auto Parts, Inc. et al
Jack Junior Waugh |
Advance Auto Parts, Inc., Air & Liquid Systems Corporation, Autozone, Inc., Bechtel Corporation, Blackmer Pump Company, Borg-Warner Morse TEC, Inc., BW/IP, Inc., CBS Corporation, CertainTeed Corporation, Covil Corporation, Crane Co., Dana Companies LLC, Daniel International Corporation, Deere & Company, Flowserve US Inc., Fluor Constructors International, Fluor Constructors International, Inc., Fluor Daniel Services Corporation, Fluor Enterprises, Inc., Ford Motor Company, General Electric Company, Genuine Parts Company, Georgia-Pacific LLC, Goulds Pumps, Inc., Grinnell, LLC, Honeywell International, Inc., LG Electronics U.S.A., Inc., Metropolitan Life Insurance Company, O'Reilly Automotive Stores, Inc., Pfizer, Inc., Pneumo Abex, LLC, RT Vanderbilt Holding Company Inc., Sequoia Ventures, Inc., Union Carbide Corporation, Uniroyal, Inc., Vanderbilt Minerals, LLC, Viad Corporation, Warren Pumps, LLC, Whirlpool Corporation, William Powell Company and Yuba Heat Transfer, LLC |
1:2016cv00310 |
September 19, 2016 |
US District Court for the Western District of North Carolina |
Asheville Office |
Catawba |
Dennis Howell |
Martin Reidinger |
Asbestos Personal Injury Product Liability |
28:1332 |
Plaintiff |
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
Document Text |
---|
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.