Moore v. Takeda Pharmaceuticals USA, Inc. et al
Plaintiff: Frank A. Moore
Defendant: Takeda Pharmaceuticals USA, Inc., Takeda Pharmaceuticals America, Inc., Takeda Development Center Americas, Inc., Takeda Pharmaceuticals International, Inc. and Takeda Pharmaceutical Company Limited
Case Number: 1:2016cv00364
Filed: November 7, 2016
Court: US District Court for the Western District of North Carolina
Office: Asheville Office
County: Rutherford
Presiding Judge: Dennis Howell
Presiding Judge: Martin Reidinger
Nature of Suit: Personal Injury- Product Liability
Cause of Action: 28 U.S.C. ยง 1332
Jury Demanded By: Plaintiff

Available Case Documents

The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:

Date Filed Document Text
March 2, 2017 Opinion or Order Filing 22 ORDER that the 21 Certification of Initial Attorneys Conference and Discovery Plan which the Court has considered as a motion and request that the Court enter a Pretrial Order and Case Management Plan is denied without prejudice. Signed by Magistrate Judge Dennis Howell on 3/2/2017. (kby)
January 10, 2017 Opinion or Order Filing 12 ORDER granting 10 Motion for Leave to Appear Pro Hac Vice, added Joseph J. Zonies for Frank A. Moore. Signed by Magistrate Judge Dennis Howell on 1/10/17. (ejb)
January 6, 2017 Opinion or Order Filing 11 ORDER granting 9 Motion for Leave to Appear Pro Hac Vice added Craig A. Thompson for Takeda Development Center Americas, Inc., Takeda Pharmaceuticals America, Inc., Takeda Pharmaceuticals International, Inc., and Takeda Pharmaceuticals USA, Inc. Signed by Magistrate Judge Dennis Howell on 1/6/17. (ejb)
Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the North Carolina Western District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: Moore v. Takeda Pharmaceuticals USA, Inc. et al
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: Frank A. Moore
Represented By: Brian Leighton Kinsley
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Takeda Pharmaceuticals USA, Inc.
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Takeda Pharmaceuticals America, Inc.
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Takeda Development Center Americas, Inc.
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Takeda Pharmaceuticals International, Inc.
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Takeda Pharmaceutical Company Limited
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?