Kegley v. Colvin
Plaintiff: Patricia Kegley
Defendant: Carolyn W. Colvin
Case Number: 1:2017cv00004
Filed: January 4, 2017
Court: US District Court for the Western District of North Carolina
Office: Asheville Office
County: Yancey
Presiding Judge: Martin Reidinger
Nature of Suit: Disability Insurance
Cause of Action: 42 U.S.C. ยง 206
Jury Demanded By: None

Available Case Documents

The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:

Date Filed Document Text
August 11, 2017 Opinion or Order Filing 15 ORDER granting 14 Motion for EAJA Attorney Fees. Signed by District Judge Martin Reidinger on 8/11/2017. (kby)
July 19, 2017 Opinion or Order Filing 13 CLERK'S JUDGMENT is hereby entered in accordance with the Court's Order of Remand dated 7/19/2017. Signed by Clerk, Frank G. Johns. (ejb)
Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the North Carolina Western District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: Kegley v. Colvin
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Carolyn W. Colvin
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: Patricia Kegley
Represented By: Charlotte Williams Hall
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?